My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092309
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 092309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:17 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:42:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/23/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan said he did not think a “sniff test” was hard to administer, but noted that if the <br />Commission goes this way, it should recognize that Little Ivy League School would fall <br />under this because it does pick-up and would not have been exempt. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that this was fine. He inquired whether the Commission will <br />see a revised staff report. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that staff will consider comments and inquired if the Commission <br />wanted to expand on the Human Services Commission’s position. <br />Commissioner Blank replied that because he was not at that meeting, he did not have <br />the benefit of creating their position and, therefore, cannot advocate for them. <br />Commissioner Olson recalled that at the previous meeting, he had commented that he <br />agreed with the Human Services Commission’s point that some of the onus need to be <br />put on the parents to know where they are putting their child. <br />Commissioner Narum referred to Chair Pearce and inquired if the speakers wanted to <br />make any additional comments. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br />Mr. MacDonald stated that he thinks the discussion was great and that everybody was <br />engaged in it. He asked that the City follow-through with an ordinance to make sure <br />that after-school care can be offered anywhere an office use is allowed. He indicated <br />that he believed a category needed to be added by ordinance and the development of a <br />set of definitions that would allow a broad number of locations. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Pearce inquired if it was staff’s intent to return the item to the Commission. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he had hoped the matter could be completed this evening. He <br />added; however, that there is flexibility in the Council’s date and that it could be returned <br />to the Commission. <br />Commissioner Blank suggested an email review. <br />Chair Pearce voiced Brown Act concerns with this method. <br />Mr. Roush stated that Council consideration would probably not happen in October, and <br />therefore, there should be sufficient time for the matter to return to the Commission, as <br />necessary. <br />Mr. Dolan suggested it return as a Consent item. The Commissioners agreed. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 23, 2009 Page 32 of 34 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.