My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092309
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 092309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:17 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:42:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/23/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum requested that if this was going to be an ordinance and handled <br />across the counter, applications with a certain number of students would warrant review <br />by the Planning Commission. She suggested the number 25-50, similar to an assembly <br />number. <br />Commissioner Blank and Chair Pearce said this has been done; the threshold number <br />was 20 or 25. <br />Commissioner Blank added that if the application was for 20 children or more, it should <br />go to the Planning Commission for a use permit. <br />Chair Pearce clarified that it would be an over-the-counter approval for 20 students or <br />less. She asked staff to be consistent with whatever is done with the schools and <br />tutoring. <br />Ms. Stern confirmed that 20 students or less would be processed through the <br />ordinance, and over 20 students would be processed as a use permit. <br />Commissioner Narum also suggested the idea of a 24-hour cooling-off period on any <br />application related to child care, where an applicant could submit all paperwork for the <br />business license and return in 24 hours to give time staff to review the request. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that staff would not be able to review an applicant’s <br />documentation for criminal background check, health screening, sign-in and sign-out <br />sheet, CPR training, disaster plan, driver’s license, driver’s and liability insurance, open <br />space equivalent, fire and safety codes, restrooms, and plain language disclosure in <br />less than 24 hours. He noted that staff would simply receive all the documentation, <br />review them, and then approve the application. <br />The Commissioners agreed. <br />Mr. Dolan inquired whether or not the Commission wanted to explore the exclusion <br />language. <br />Ms. Stern stated that the concept of finding that these are uses where parents rely on <br />them for child care is what everyone knows as child care. She noted that she felt it was <br />difficult to translate that into language but that staff can work on it. She added that the <br />hours came out of the desire for an objective measure, i.e., whether or not the child <br />stays at the facility for 10 hours or not. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that as Mr. Roush indicated earlier, child care is reliance on <br />picking-up and dropping-off, that it is a “sniff test,” and that when people bring in an <br />application and they have everything that is needed, it will be obvious as to whether or <br />not it is a child care or not. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 23, 2009 Page 31 of 34 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.