My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092309
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 092309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:17 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:42:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/23/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Pearce noted that the problem would still exist because the children are <br />competing and going for more than ten hours.She indicated that she was not sure she <br />wants them subjected to regulations. <br />Commissioner Pentin agreed and stated that the First Tee program at the Pleasanton <br />Golf Course is a good example. He noted that as children are supervised there, they <br />can be out there 20 hours a week practicing into the evenings, in which case they would <br />fall under this. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that most of those groups require and conduct background <br />checks of some sort. She added that it would appear almost all athletic groups will have <br />a significant number of children affected, thereby forcing those organizations to come <br />under Alternative 1 or 2. <br />Ms. Stern stated that the Commission could write a specific exemption for those types <br />of groups, such as those types of co-sponsorship groups that participate in background <br />checks. <br />Commissioner Pentin indicated that he was involved with one of the largest junior golf <br />organizations in the State that implements a child protection plan that requires <br />background checks. He noted that if they ran a program in Pleasanton, they would <br />have their own background checks in place. He inquired if these organizations would <br />be exempt. <br />Commissioner Narum referred to the list on page 1 of Attachment 1, second bullet point <br />from the bottom. <br />Mr. Roush stated that he thought the qualification for child care is where families rely on <br />the facility for actual child care for their children. He added that he did not consider a <br />sports situation as child care. <br />Ms. Stern noted that the previous paragraph discusses operating year-round in a <br />permanent facility, which is why the aquatics group came up, but that perhaps some of <br />the other groups would not come under that. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she felt the leagues would be competitive and year- <br />round, but most likely not all in a permanent facility. She noted that gymnastics is <br />year-round and that when the ice rink is built, there will be figure skaters and hockey <br />players practicing more than 20 hours a week. <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the objective in those is sports training and not child <br />care. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he does not know anyone who participates in <br />competitive activities that rely on it for child care. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 23, 2009 Page 22 of 34 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.