OCT 1933 TO MAY 1946 - Laserfiche WebLink

10G5 The f llowing communications were then read by the Clerk: January 5th -- Southern Pacific Company, J. E. Gaylord, Superintendent, advising the Council that the crossing on Ray Street is not a public crossing and therefore it cannot be given wig -wag consideration. it " 19th- -James B. IvIcSheeby, President of the Board of Supervisors, City and County of San Francisco, advising with regards.to a meeting on January 25th with reference to existing -c ondi t ions covering state liquor control. 20th = -Dr. 1. 0. Church, County Health Officer, advising the City Council with regards to investigations made on January 17th of the plant of the Standard Cheese Corporation and the garbage dump of Steve Adamian, both of which received his attention. " 20th =- Edward K. Hussey, Chief Engineer, Civil Works Administration, advising as regards Amador Valley High School district project and the Town of Pleasanton retaining wall along Del Valle Creek north of Division Street. 24th-- Ialrs. Larkin Ili. Locke, complaining about tree trimming on Railroad Avenue. 25th - -J. W. Grace, Industrial Commissioner of the Western•Pacific Railroad Company objection to an open drainage ditch being put along the right - of -way of, the railroad between Bernal Avenue and St. Marys Street. 30th -W. A. Moore, manager of the Oakland District,-California State Auto - mobile Association,taith reference to street signs ordered by sir. Garatti. ° February 2nd - -Zee H. Newbert, of the Pacific Gas & Electric Co. advising with reference to changes made in lights recently ordered by the Town of Pleasanton. Dance permits were requested.by Clay Elworthy on behalf of Pleasanton Post No. 237, Amer can Legion for Saturtday.evening, February 10th, the dance to be given at the 4eterans' Memorial Building, and M. Gratzer on behalf of M. Gratzer, Ballz Senn and Angelo Uliano for a dance to be given on Saturday evening, February 17th at the I.D.E.S. Hall. There being no objections to these permits being granted•same. were ordered allowed.- ` - A recess followed during which the finance committee examined Claims 14o. 297 to 334 inclusive and amounting to $597.01 as well as the officers'monthly reports. Following the recess after the meeting had been called to order again, Councilman Madsen of the Finance Committee reported that the committee had approved Claims No. 297 to 334 and amounting to $597.01. On his motion, seconded by Councilman Garatti and with all present in favor of same, the claims were ordered paid. Councilman Madsen then reported that the finance committee had approved the officers' monthly reports and he made a motion that they be placed on filed. His motion was seconded by Councilman Garatti There being no objections-same were ordered filed. Action on the communications received were then taken as follows: January 5th -- Southern Pacific Railroad Company, J.E.Gaylord. Filed. 19th- -James B. McSheeby, President of the Board of Supervisors, City and County of San Francisco. Filed. IT of " 20th--Dr. 1. 0, Church, County Health Officer. Filed. 20th -- Edward' =K. Hussey, Chief Engineer, Civil Works Administration. Filed. 24th- -Mrs . Larkin Id. Locke. Communication referred to Councilman Garatti 1 for attention. 25th - -J, W. Grace, Industrial Commissioner, Western Pacific Railroad Company. Some discussion followed with regards to this work and it was decided that the Clerk should write to the yi'estern Pacific to the affect that the matter had been temporarily given up and that same would not be attended to at this time unless some assurance was given that the Civil Works Administration committee would O.K. the drainage project sumbitted it. Mr. Garatti then discussed an underground drain from Division Street toward the Arroyo Del Valle Creek and suggested that the County Surveyor be employed to survey the property and to give the town an idea of what might be done to benefit conditions on the streets which would be concerned. This suggestion of Iulr. Garatti was favorably received by the Council. Discussion then followed among the Counciembers with regards to the inattention of the Civil Works Admiilistration to the requests of the municipality. Clerk Schween reported on his letters, phone calls and visits to headquarters and is inability to secure any.information from that source. He also told of a check -up that had been made during January