My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
DEC 1923 TO SEP 1933
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
DEC 1923 TO MAY 1954
>
DEC 1923 TO SEP 1933
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2011 1:27:20 PM
Creation date
9/8/2009 9:28:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/3/1923
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report of Special Auditgr <br />Pleasanton,Cal. Nov. 29th 1924. <br />Board of Trustees of the Town of Pleasanton. Gentlemen:- As a suppliment to my <br />report of July 5th,in which Isubmitted a report of the audit of the books of the Town of <br />Pleasanton from June 1st 1914 to June 1st 1923, 1 beg to herewith submit a final report <br />for the fiscal year ending may 3fst 1924: <br />Balance last report, 4 6,780.33 Disbursements <br />Taxes ool.by Marshal 7,844.10 paid out for salaries 6 600.00 <br />II Clerk 574.65 n n al n <br />Business Licenses 3,872:50 N labor, 1,996.37 <br />Dog License 30.65 team work I,073.50 <br />Dance Fees, 75.00 II II II misc. expenses 11,591.75 <br />Court Fees, 280.00 P ermanent Improvements 2,938.35 <br />Rents, 61.00 <br />Water collections Town -6 ;942.15 <br />County 1,464.36 <br />State on Bond Indebtedness 371.24 <br />Coldly Good Roads Fund 984.44 <br />Interest on deposits 134.20 <br />Under improvement act 57.00 Balance on hand 7,271.65 <br />Recess <br />Total 31;471.62 .Total. <br />We have made a complete detail examination of the books of the Clerk; Treasurer, <br />and the Marshal and find that although there were several minor discrepancies, they are <br />due mainly to clerical errors which are liable to occur in the course of business when :r <br />handled by other than expert bookeepers. F,.or instance I find that the Marshal was <br />charged with Taxes 4 7,844.90 less a rebate 4.00, to Philip:Kolb wheras his deposits <br />totaled 4 7,844.10 a difference of 80¢. <br />In the Marshals collections of licenses in my last report I found a deficitof 4 24.00 <br />in this years collections 1 find that he turned in 452.00 more than the actual licenses <br />charged against xgaixtri again him. <br />In the Clerks books I found an 'error of IN in claim #219 and an error in computation <br />of Taxes in bill no. 37 of 50ri 'also found a duplicate entry of 412. in the licenses xk <br />charged to the Marshal. gowever'these differences are due mainly to he system of keep- <br />ing the books that was in vogue at that time. Your Clerk has adopted a system which we <br />beleive will reduce the liability of errors to a minimrn as well as maintain the books <br />of your officers in a mannerWhich will provide for a complete check in the differ =n <br />In this connection I want to call your attention to 4778.82 which was charged against <br />your Marshal as of my last report.and which has now been reduced to 4721.62 by overpayment <br />during last year. as this amount was represented by various items that had for years been <br />charged to the marshal's account in the matter of licenses, etc., and when returned unpaid <br />had never been charged off, but remains as a charge. It appears that the only way of <br />clenringbyour books is to draw a resolution authorizing the clerk to credit the account <br />•of the marshal with $721.62, and under the new system adopted hold him accountable to what- <br />ever is charged against him. <br />The plan adopted is briefly as follows: The town engineer turns his meter readings <br />over to the clerk who makes the computation and enters the charges in his book, and <br />when completed gives the hiiia to the Aarsnal for colleetior, charging him with the <br />amount. <br />At the end of the month the marshal turns into the clerk the amount of his actual <br />collections, which, together with the unpaid bills, makes up the total of the water <br />charges. The unpaid bolls are charged back to the custtmers with the succeedi}g month's <br />bills. <br />If for any reason a bill cannot be collected it should be referred to the trustees for <br />action. <br />The same plan is followed with licenses, onl, in this case it will be neeessary for <br />unpaid licenses to be revoked by the board. <br />This system is already in operation for this fiscal year, and will greatly simplify, <br />the audit of the books next year. <br />These Reports were referred to the finance committee. <br />Communications <br />31,47I.62 <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />T. H. Silverm, Special auditor. <br />The following communications were received and read: <br />From the Alameda County Tuberculosis Association, asking the board to purchase <br />Christmas seals for the 'Tuberculosis sanitarium at Cresta Blanca, <br />From the Spring Valley Water company relative to property now being used by the <br />Town as municipal camp grounds. <br />From. the Department of Commerce relative to Zoning plans. <br />The board then took a recess during which time the finance committee examined <br />the claims against the town and also the officers' monthly report. <br />Finance Committee Report <br />On again being called to order, Chairman Pickard of the finance committee reported <br />having examined nd approved Claims Numbered from 111 to 130 inclusive and also Claim <br />No. 88 <br />held over from the preceeding month, amounting to 4606.08, and moved that <br />609 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.