Laserfiche WebLink
Hacienda Mixed Use Rezoning Initial Study <br /> such resources. Additionally, mitigation measures may be imposed to provide for archaeological sites <br /> discovered during construction. Generally, imposing mitigation measures would reduce archeological <br /> resource effects to a less than- significant level. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Items <br /> Less than Significant Impacts. As noted above, the project site is in an area of high archaeological <br /> sensitivity. The zoning change itself would not include any construction, and the proposed residential <br /> and retail land uses would not be expected to result in any greater impacts, if any, than could occur <br /> under existing zoning and under the existing development plan. This issue will be addressed in the <br /> environmental review documents at the time a development plan is proposed for the project sites. <br /> No Impact. As noted above, all pre business park structures located at Hacienda were demolished and <br /> only the relatively new structures related to the business park remain. Therefore, the project would not <br /> result in a direct impact to historic resources. No rock outcroppings are located in the project vicinity <br /> and no paleontological remains have been identified nearby, or would be expected in this area. <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant with Less Than No <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant Impact <br /> Impact Incorporation Impact <br /> 6. Geology and Soils Would the project: <br /> a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse <br /> effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the X <br /> most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map <br /> issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other <br /> substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of <br /> Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X <br /> iii) Seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction? X <br /> iv) Landslides? X <br /> b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X <br /> c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that X <br /> would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially <br /> result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, <br /> liquefaction or collapse? <br /> d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of <br /> the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to X <br /> life or property? <br /> e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X <br /> septic tanks or altemative waste water disposal systems where <br /> sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> The three project sites are located on relatively flat land. The City has referred to the Public Safety <br /> Element of the Pleasanton General Plan and to the geotechnical investigation prepared for the Hacienda <br /> Draft, Subject to Revision 13 8/31/2009 <br />