My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
102009
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2009 11:21:06 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 3:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hacienda Mixed Use Rezoning Initial Study <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> The three project sites are located within Hacienda and are surrounded by office, light industrial, and <br /> residential development. The sites are already allowed to be developed under the Hacienda PUD (for <br /> which a EIR has been certified). No agricultural land uses are located within the project vicinity. <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The impact questions above constitute the significance criteria for this environmental topic. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Questions <br /> No Impact. The project sites are not developed as farmland, are not under Williamson Act contract, and <br /> have been within a business park since its inception. <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant with Less Than No <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant Impact <br /> Impact Incorporation Impact <br /> 3. Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria <br /> established by the applicable air quality management or air <br /> pollution control district may be relied upon to make the <br /> following determinations. Would the project: <br /> a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the X <br /> applicable air quality plan? <br /> b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X <br /> to an existing or projected air quality violation? <br /> c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X <br /> criteria pollutant for which the project region is non <br /> attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air <br /> quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed <br /> quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br /> d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X <br /> concentrations? <br /> e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X <br /> of people? <br /> Background <br /> Land uses such as schools, children's daycare centers, hospitals, convalescent homes, and senior housing <br /> are considered to be more sensitive than the general public to poor air quality because the population <br /> groups associated with these uses have a greater susceptibility to respiratory distress. Persons engaged in <br /> strenuous work or exercise also have a greater sensitivity to poor air quality. Residential areas are <br /> considered more sensitive to air quality conditions than commercial and industrial areas, because people <br /> generally spend longer periods of time at their residences, resulting in greater exposure to ambient air <br /> quality conditions. Recreational uses are also considered sensitive, due to the greater exposure to <br /> ambient air quality conditions, and because the presence of pollution detracts from the recreational <br /> experience. <br /> Draft, Subject to Revision 8 8/31/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.