My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
102009
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2009 11:21:06 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 3:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum stated that if the Commission felt that the park standard is not up <br /> to what it wants, and if all three properties had high- density housing to the point where <br /> you would almost need to set aside a piece of land somewhere, it appears this would <br /> need to be addressed in the Business Park PUD modification as opposed to one of the <br /> individual parcels where a piece of the property would gave to be set aside for a park. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that he thinks the overall PUD process would be forced to anticipate <br /> the scenario that would create that demand. <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired if the point in time the School District would indicate that <br /> it can or cannot handle the number of students that the development is expected to <br /> generate would be at the time the rezoning is approved, the PUD for the Business Park <br /> is modified, and the individual PUDs start coming in. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the school issue is a difficult one in all communities because <br /> everybody perceives that their school cannot handle more growth. He stated that in this <br /> case, based on recent events, there are situations of bigger classroom sizes; <br /> unfortunately, the expectation that boundaries among schools are not adjusted in <br /> response to development is probably unrealistic. He noted that this happens in every <br /> community and that families are affected by it. He added that while this is not ideal, if <br /> this is part of the equation, there is a lot of lead time to gear up for it so that a likely <br /> solution can be found if there is a particular school with an issue. <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired whether or not the Commission would conceivable <br /> condition the PUD that prior to building, the School District would have to evaluate the <br /> situation. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the School District must respond to those kids who show up for <br /> school and not vice versa. <br /> Mr. Roush clarified that in the early 1990's when the School District and the City were <br /> attempting to determine how many schools would be needed for eventual build -out of <br /> the City, it was assumed that ten elementary schools would be needed, three middle <br /> schools, and two high schools of an expanded nature. He continued that as a result of <br /> that, there was a nexus study done in terms of how much money would have to be <br /> collected as residential property developed such that the facilities would be in place <br /> when the kids arrived. He noted that this process continued for 15 or more years, and <br /> when growth seemed to slow significantly in the early 2000, the School District made a <br /> decision not to build a tenth elementary school, although this is still within its Master <br /> Plan. He added that presumably, given the amount of growth, this may cause another <br /> facility to be built to accommodate the children, and the money will be generated from <br /> the development that occurs to pay for those facilities. He stated that it is supposed to <br /> work in tandem that way, but given the State budget situation, the impact has been <br /> dramatic and unfortunate; however, this was somewhat unrelated to the number of <br /> facilities. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/23/2009 Page 13 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.