Laserfiche WebLink
otherwise, prohibit the parking of vehicles, both commercial and recreational, that are greater <br /> than 20 feet in length. <br /> Councilmember McGovern said she considered the City's amended fees for abandoned <br /> vehicles to be too low, noted that other cities charge as much as $450 and she felt the fine <br /> should be stiff enough to cover any procedural and towing expenses. Mr. Roush stated that <br /> nothing would preclude the Council from raising any of these fees. <br /> Mr. Fialho stated that the Council adopted a fee policy in the mid -1990s which describes the <br /> intent to determine fees that meet the cost of enforcement and are high enough to discourage <br /> repeat offenses. <br /> Councilmember McGovern noted that the same fee applies to abandoned vehicles on both <br /> public and private property. She recommended amending both fees to a minimum of $235, <br /> which would be equal to what is charged by the City of Livermore. She questioned if that <br /> amount would cover administrative and towing costs. Chief Fraser explained that the City is not <br /> responsible for any fees associated with towing; those fees are added to the registered owner's <br /> lien amount. <br /> Councilmember McGovern said it is often necessary for code enforcement officers to ticket <br /> these vehicles more than once. If the fee were raised as suggested, it may cover the City's cost <br /> and encourage more responsible behavior in the future. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan asked how the difference between an abandoned vehicle and one <br /> parked for over 72 hours is determined. Chief Fraser said that the physical condition and <br /> surroundings of the vehicle are considered and courtesy citations are employed to induce the <br /> owner to move the vehicle. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan confirmed that both public and private violations carry a fine and <br /> cautioned against getting overzealous about what one does on their own property. Chief Fraser <br /> explained that action is typically taken as a result of neighbors' complaints. <br /> Mr. Fialho stated that staff first makes contact with the resident and encourages them to resolve <br /> the situation before a ticket is issued. <br /> Vice -Mayor Cook- Kallio said that $150 to have an abandoned vehicle towed away could be <br /> considered a deal for its owner. She asked how the fines are collected in the instance that a car <br /> has been sold several times and has an unclear title. She favored making the fine stiff enough <br /> to discourage future infractions and asked how successful staff is at collecting these fines. <br /> Mr. Roush said that, while staff may be unable to collect on the fine per say, a hold is placed <br /> upon the registered owner's license. He said that matter is usually resolved during court <br /> proceedings on unrelated matters. <br /> Councilmember McGovern said she understood that tickets for using a cell phone while driving <br /> where based on a minimum state fine that local agencies can then add additional fines to. She <br /> asked what Pleasanton's fee is. Mr. Roush explained that the fine is a minimum of $83. Chief <br /> Fraser clarified that different counties have different fee schedules; the minimum mentioned by <br /> Mr. Roush is a county court fee. <br /> Mayor Hosterman noted there were no speakers on this item. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 7 September 15, 2009 <br />