Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Sullivan requested an update on the Alamo Canal undercrossing. Mr. Fialho <br /> estimated it would be completed within the next 12 to 24 months. He stated that the engineering <br /> analysis should be ready for Council review in the next year, after which staff will work with <br /> Dublin and East Bay Regional Parks District to obtain funding. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan asked how the ADA component of this plan ties in with the City's <br /> accessibility survey. Mr. Tassano said the plan utilizes data obtained in the development of the <br /> accessibility survey and establishes similar, although not identical, priorities. Mr. Fialho <br /> explained that this plan addresses the more walkable areas of town, whereas the ADA survey <br /> took a more comprehensive approach <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked if the ADA priorities were discussed with CRILL (Community <br /> Resources for Independent Living) or the City's ADA community. Mr. Fialho said there has been <br /> no specific discussion but that this is a less comprehensive reflection of the same CIP list that <br /> CRILL has already been asked to review. <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked and Mr. Fialho confirmed that CRILL believes these <br /> specifications to comply with current ADA requirements. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said that Santa Rita Road north of Valley Avenue is a difficult place for <br /> cyclists and that the proposed sharrows may be insufficient. He thanked Mr. Tassano for the <br /> considerable improvements to the City's bike routes that have already been initiated. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. <br /> Carmen Rivera noted that wheelchairs cannot access the Iron Horse Trail, said that the lack of <br /> access limits her outdoor enjoyment, and asked that staff consider these needs in the proposed <br /> improvements. She requested a copy of the master plan to be used in tandem with the <br /> accessibility survey for securing funding. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed the public hearing and continued the item to the next Council meeting. <br /> 15. Continued from September 1, 2009 Consider adopting a resolution amending the Master <br /> Fee Schedule related to Parking Citation Penalties and introduce an ordinance amending <br /> Chapter 1.12 (General Penalty) and Chapter 11.38 (Residential Permit Parking Zone) of <br /> the Pleasanton Municipal Code <br /> Mr. Roush presented the staff report, stating that after parking citations were decriminalized by <br /> the State of California in 1993, the City's Master Fee Schedule was amended to include parking <br /> violation penalties. At that time, the state collected $5 of every citation to finance court <br /> construction and renovations. In 2008, the state increased that fee to $9.50 per citation and staff <br /> determined that it was necessary to review and amend the City's Master Fee Schedule, while <br /> keeping in mind the fees of neighboring cities. <br /> Mr. Roush reviewed the proposed fee changes, noting that the City's fees are much in line with <br /> or below those of the surrounding area and reflect the cost of citation processing by City staff. <br /> He said that staff would recommend that the Council adopt the Master Fee Schedule and <br /> resolution. He introduced Police Chief Fraser and Assistant City Attorney Renee Perko. <br /> Councilmember McGovern requested clarification on parking restrictions for vehicles over 20 <br /> feet in length. Chief Fraser stated that most areas of Pleasanton, unless expressly signed <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 September 15, 2009 <br />