Laserfiche WebLink
F. High Rise Alternative. <br /> <br /> f.1 Finding. The High Rise Alternative is infeasible <br /> because it creates negative impacts outweighing its <br /> beneficial impacts. <br /> <br /> f.2 Facts. Aesthetic and fire safety impacts outweigh <br /> the beneficial effects of on-site park land. <br /> <br />XIII. Growth Inducement. <br /> <br /> A. Significant.Effect- Growth-inducing impacts associated <br /> with provisions of basic employment, removal of flood <br /> hazards, generation of more jobs than employees can be <br /> housed locally, and construction of water and sewage <br /> treatment and other service facilities likely sized for <br /> additional growth. <br /> <br /> Growth-inducing impacts have been analyzed separately <br /> under each subject matter heading herein and have been <br /> found to be avoided or substantially lessened because of <br /> the incorporation of feasible mitigation measures, or <br /> have been found unavoidable because mitigation measures <br /> and alternatives have been found to be infeasible. <br /> <br />Overridinq Considerations <br /> <br />Potential adverse environmental effects which cannot feasibly be <br />avoided while allowing the project to proceed include the <br />following: <br /> <br /> - permanent loss of agricultural land <br /> <br /> - growth-inducing effects of additional growth in the <br /> Tri-Valley, including loss of open space, increased <br /> traffic and energy usage, increased noise levels, <br /> degradation of air quality, and increased demand for <br /> urban services <br /> <br /> - cumulative effect upon the need or housing, particularly <br /> affordable housing, within the region <br /> <br /> - unacceptable congestion on Tri-Valley freeways given <br /> buildout with presently announced freeway plans <br /> <br /> - potential flooding due to cumulative buildout during <br /> 100-year flood events downstream along Arroyo de la <br /> Laguna <br /> <br /> - change in visual character of the area, including loss <br /> of some distant vistas and agricultural open space <br /> <br /> Despite these effects, the benefits of the proposed project <br /> outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, and, <br /> thus, the adverse environmental effects are considered <br /> <br /> - 18 - <br /> <br /> <br />