Laserfiche WebLink
Jeff Renholts stated that he lives right behind Foothill High School and knows what <br />noise is. He addressed the Millers’ statement that the Masons do not attend any of <br />the functions and indicated that while they do not attend the functions, they are on <br />the premises during the time that the event is going on to monitor activity and noise. <br />He noted that several times during the course of the evening, he has walked the <br />perimeter of the property, out to the fence line of neighbors, and in all cases, unless <br />the doors are open, which are closed after 8:30 p.m. or 9:00 p.m. in deference to <br />neighbors, one cannot tell whether there is anything going on in the premises that is <br />any louder than street noise or music playing from somebody’s family room in an <br />adjacent house. He stated that if the noise is noticeable, they require the DJ to turn <br />down the music to an acceptable level. <br />Mr. Renholts noted that up until a few years ago, there was no fence between <br />Hopyard Road and the back street that abuts St. Clare’s property. He added that <br />there was a complete pass-through there as parkland, and while it was a buffer, it <br />was an ideal place for people to gather. He stated that they would constantly find <br />empty beer bottles and other bottles in the bushes on both their and St. Clare’s <br />properties; hence, the blame should not solely be on those using the Lodge. <br />There being no other speakers, Chair Pearce stated that the item would be <br />continued to a future meeting, with the public hearing remaining open. <br />Mr. Dolan clarified that it was the intention of staff to have the noise study conducted <br />by a noise professional at the City’s direction and funded by the applicant, which <br />would not cause any conflict of interest. <br />Commissioner Blank requested that staff provide larger, blown-up site drawings in <br />order that the Commission can properly read them. He further asked that staff <br />review the double door that was permitted but not finaled, as well as its legal <br />standing. <br />Commissioner Fox referred to the January 18, 2009 police call under Exhibit H, <br />noting that there were “600kids in attendance with a line to get in” and inquired what <br />type of occupancy the building had, the maximum number of occupants allowed, <br />what the ingress and egress is, and where the line was out to the roadway. She <br />noted that there were similar noise issues experienced in the past from Toby’s <br />Restaurant and the Marquee, which came to the Planning Commission and the City <br />Council. She recalled that with Toby’s, there was some discussion about <br />soundproofing and automatic shutting doors. She requested that the Chief Building <br />Official be involved in refining the condition regarding the noise attenuation and work <br />in conjunction with the noise study consultant. She further requested that a <br />representative from the Police Department be present when this comes back to the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Chair Pearce continued the public hearing to a future Planning Commission meeting. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 25, 2009 Page 9 of 27 <br /> <br />