My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062409
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 062409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:40:41 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 9:18:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum noted that in both sets of conditions of approval, she did not find <br />any reference to hours of construction and inquired whether or not this would be <br />included. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that the hours of construction, which are set per the EIR, are located <br />in the Appendix. <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted that the hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday <br />through Saturday, as noted on page 7. <br />Ms Giffin indicated that earlier construction times would be allowed if deemed <br />appropriate and necessary by the Director of Community Development, for such things <br />as foundation work. <br />Commissioner Narum referred to page 6 of the Hendrick staff report and inquired why <br />fruit trees are specifically called out. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that the applicant was concerned that the drought-tolerant trees <br />initially recommended by staff would drop many leaves and seed pods on their <br />inventory, and they would continuously have to wash the cars. She added that <br />Hendrick suggested fruitless fruit trees with large evergreen canopies, which staff <br />supported. <br />Commissioner Narum asked Mr. Tye why he does not want to build PV-ready buildings. <br />Mr. Tye replied that there are other alternative energy solutions for the project besides <br />PV and that they have requested that they be allowed to look into those alternatives, <br />including PV. He indicated that they would be willing to prep the buildings for a PV <br />project, but not they are not quite that far along to commit to building a PV project. He <br />noted that it is likely they may need to do something like this to be energy-compliant <br />with LEED, but they would like to keep it voluntary at this time. <br />Commissioner Narum asked if Mr. Tye was willing to accept a condition that buildings <br />be made ready for PV panels. She further inquired if PV panels might ultimately be one <br />of the things they may do to achieve the required LEED points. <br />Mr. Tye replied that there are a number of ways to achieve LEED points; however, if <br />they run into this problem and PV is the way to solve it, they would go ahead with it. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that it is less expensive to prep buildings for PV at <br />construction, and going back later to do it almost eliminates the possibility as it would be <br />more expensive and reduces future flexibility. <br />Mr. Tye agreed that there is a cost factor but they are not sure where they will end up <br />with LEED. He reiterated that they would like to keep it voluntary before construction if <br />it makes economic sense, and he did not want it to be a condition of approval at this <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2009 Page 8 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.