My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062409
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 062409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:40:41 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 9:18:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Bocian stated that as mentioned earlier by Ms. Giffin, staff had extracted this <br />reference from another document and added it to a condition as a requirement from the <br />EIR. <br />Commissioner Blank stated he noticed in the CLC documentation that there are <br />provisions for an emergency generator. He inquired if this was also subject to noise <br />limitations, as he did not see it specifically spelled out in the conditions. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that the applicant is proposing two emergency back-up generators; <br />one for the health center and one for the central plant. She added that there is a <br />condition of approval which reiterates the standard conditions of the Pleasanton <br />Municipal Code. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired whether there is also a need to state that noise limits <br />apply to the generators or whether they were exempt. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that generators are not exempt and that the standard noise conditions <br />would apply to them. <br />Commissioner Pentin noted that on page 3 of CLC’s Exhibit B, it states: “All exterior <br />streetlight bollards and building lights will be compact fluorescent” but that he sees <br />different types of lights elsewhere. He inquired what the lighting for both projects would <br />be. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that Hendrick Automotive Group would have metal halo lights as <br />required by the EIR. She suggested that CLC clarify the lighting for their project. <br />Dennis DiBiase, project architect, stated that they have not identified the type of lamp <br />for the project’s lighting fixtures. He noted that they have done a lighting study which <br />was submitted to staff to ensure they had enough foot candles and that they were <br />shielding lighting from the neighbors. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to page 7 of the CLC Exhibit A, which states: “if a <br />carwash area is provided” and inquired if a carwash area would be provided. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that a carwash area is not proposed at this time; however, staff added <br />the condition in the event that if one was proposed in the future, the applicants would be <br />aware that they do have to cover the carwash area and grade the site such that storm <br />drainage goes into the carwash area instead of throughout the rest of the site. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to the golf course for the CLC project and noted that the <br />legend states the shots are only possibly 20-30 yards. He pointed out that the last hole <br />is right at Stoneridge Drive and inquired if netting would be used. <br />Mr. DiBiase replied that it is pitch-and-putt and agreed to fine-tune it. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2009 Page 7 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.