PC 062409 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chair Pearce proposed an amendment to the motion to revise Condition No. 6 to require Planning Commission review of any future proposal for rooftop parking. Commissioners Blank and Narum accepted the amendment. Commissioner Narum inquired whether the Commission was comfortable with the approach on the green building and allowing Hendrick to determine how they are going to achieve LEED points without requiring PV. Commissioner Blank stated that he is hopeful staff will have numbers and believed that if the construction cost to prepare the building is ½ percent of the cost of total construction costs, he would ask that it be done to allow the flexibility for it to be installed in the future. He noted, however, that if the percentage comes out to be ten percent of construction costs, Hendrick has a good point. Commissioner Narum noted that they may end up having to do PV to achieve the required number of green building points. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolution No. PC-2009-17 recommending approval of Case PUD-57 was entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioners Blank moved to make the PUD findings for the proposed development plan as listed in the staff report and recommend approval to the City Council of Case PUD-68, subject to conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A, including the Project-Specific, General and Appendix 1 conditions, and staff’s memo, dated June 23, 2009, modifying Conditions 3.l. and 5.b. of the General Conditions and Condition 1.l.A.3. of Appendix 1. Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. Commissioner O’Connor stated that he would like to ensure that the airport flight path is disclosed to potential buyers. Commissioner Blank confirmed it was included in disclosures. Commissioner Narum commented that she thinks the project is great and will be a great addition to the City. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2009 Page 18 of 22