Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Tye confirmed that the wall in question is the one next to Caltrans along the <br />freeway. He added that if Caltrans agrees, they would remove the chain link fence that <br />runs about 1,000 feet across the project and replace it with an attractive, black <br />wrought-iron fence to front the property, starting where the berm ends and extending <br />completely around the project until it stops at El Charro Road. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired if there would be vines covering it. <br />Mr. Tye replied that he did not recall it having any vine treatment.He stated that the <br />green wall is on the buildings. <br />Ms. Giffin stated that Commissioner Pentin may be thinking of a recommended <br />condition of approval that vines and shrubs and trees be placed in front of the berm wall <br />and the wall for the storage area by the central plant. She noted that the reason for this <br />screening is to deter graffiti tagging. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that with this in mind, he inquired if it would be possible to <br />consider the same kind of wall with some vegetation for the seven-foot tall wall between <br />Hendrick and the Neighborhood Park to deter similar graffiti tagging. <br />Mr. Tye replied that they would actually prefer this, if possible. <br />Commissioners Blank moved to make the PUD findings for the proposed <br />development plan as listed in the staff report and recommend approval to the City <br />Council of Case PUD-57, subject to conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A, <br />including the Project-Specific, General and Appendix 1 conditions, with a <br />modification to Condition No. 9 of the Project-Specific Conditions that the <br />landscaping plans be revised to completely screen with landscaping the southern <br />and western elevations of the proposed wall by the Neighborhood Park to deter <br />graffiti tagging. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />Chair Pearce stated that if there were no objections, she would like to add a condition <br />that the rooftop parking issue undergo a PUD modification process and inquired if it <br />would be a minor modification and therefore go through the Zoning Administration <br />process. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes; he believed, however, that it is a substantial change which staff <br />would typically bring forward to the Planning Commission. <br />Chair Pearce inquired if it would be a significant change if language were added that it <br />return to the Planning Commission. <br />Mr. Dolan confirmed that was correct. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2009 Page 17 of 22 <br /> <br />