My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062409
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 062409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:40:41 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 9:18:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Stephanie Yue referred to the light standards at the back of Staples Ranch which are <br />proposed to be ten feet tall and inquired whether or not they would be in operation all <br />night long. She stated that she attended the October 11, 2005 workshop for the project <br />and urged the Commission to speed up and approve that project because she did not <br />want it developed by the City of Livermore as Pleasanton has higher standards and will <br />receive the tax base. <br />Marge Johnson stated that she sold real estate in town for many years. She added that <br />she believed Pleasanton is forward-looking and that she does not want to move out of <br />state. She asked the Commission to approve the project. <br />John Carroll inquired whether or not there will be a 45-day review period for the public <br />to review the results and proposed mitigations of the SEIR. He noted that he felt it is <br />important for people to be aware of CEQA requirements and is hopeful that construction <br />equipment can use access and egress off of El Charro Road as opposed to Stoneridge <br />Drive. <br />Peter MacDonald stated his support of all the projects and indicated that he would like <br />the option of living in a retirement community when that time comes in the future. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if there is a notification requirement for the Airport <br />flight path noise. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he thought this was included in the information. <br />Ms. Giffin stated that there are several disclosure requirements regarding the airport <br />which are located in the Appendix. She added that they are also required by the EIR <br />and Pre-Development and Cooperation Agreement. <br />Commissioner Blank requested staff to go back and review the requirements, stating <br />that he thought they contain the notification period, although this may not affect the CLC <br />because he believed they were possibly outside the Airport Protection Area but within <br />the noise area. <br />Commissioner O’Connor recalled that in earlier discussions, it was confirmed that they <br />were outside the APA, but the Planning Commission wanted them specifically <br />disclosed. He emphasized that he wanted to be sure this happens. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired whether there are two required bus shelters and pads <br />and whether or not they are shared. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2009 Page 13 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.