My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 070809
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 070809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:40:47 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 9:03:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/8/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
if the Commission chooses Option A and requires State licensing, the State also has in <br />its regulations provisions for sign-in/sign-out policies, which means that the City would <br />not have to require this on top of the State requirement. She noted that the State’s <br />requirement is not age-specific. <br />Commissioner Olson requested a definition of a heritage school. <br />Ms. Stern stated that a heritage school is generally a school where a different language <br />other than English is taught. She elaborated that the school teaches language classes <br />as well as the culture of that particular heritage. She indicated that she did not know <br />that any particular heritage would be necessarily included or excluded, and legislation <br />would require some sort of association which would develop standards for background <br />checks and other requirements. <br />Chair Pearce said there was a concern raised about managing complaints if the <br />Commission chose Option B. She asked how complaints are managed now for exempt <br />child care. Mr. Dolan said he believes complaints are generally limited to traffic and <br />noise and not child safety issues. <br />Chair Pearce stated that she was aware there were concerns raised about increased <br />City liability and asked Ms. Harryman if she sees this as a concern. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that if a child is injured in a program and thinks that the City was <br />responsible in certifying the operation, the injured would look to blame parties and the <br />City will undoubtedly be named. She agreed there is exposure but believed the City <br />also has governmental immunities and would prevail. <br />Chair Pearce stated that she did not believe this was much different from the exempt <br />child care that the City now authorizes. <br />Ms. Harryman agreed. <br />Chair Pearce inquired if a child care facility would be considered in situations where <br />some children are there over 10 hours during the school year and 15 hours in the <br />summer. She provided an example of a gymnastics facility where the majority of <br />children attend for an hour or so, but a minority of children who are on a competitive <br />team are there for 10-12 hours a week. She inquired if this would then be categorized <br />as a child care facility. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. She added that she was not sure there was a way around not <br />categorizing it as a child care facility. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Jack Balch stated that as a result of his having gone through a long process as a <br />landlord, he is very familiar with the State licensing process. He indicated that he was <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 8, 2009 Page 6 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.