Laserfiche WebLink
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Initial Study <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The impact questions above constitute the significance standard for this environmental topic. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Items <br /> Less -than- Significant Impacts. Future development of trails, bicycle routes, and sidewalks due to <br /> implementation of the proposed Master Plan would be expected to result in few changes to the drainage <br /> patterns or little addition to site runoff as the trails and routes would be relatively narrow and /or semi <br /> permeable and thus result in minimal additional runoff. Surface water runoff may cause erosion. Most <br /> of the planned trails within hilly areas that could be subject to erosion would not be paved and thus <br /> would be not be as subject to surface water runoff as paved trails. Thus proposed Master Plan <br /> implementation would not exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or <br /> provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. In addition, there are no plans to alter a <br /> watercourse due to Master Plan implementation. The proposed Master Plan and its implementation <br /> would not otherwise degrade water quality. <br /> The proposed trails, bicycle routes, and sidewalks are not at any greater hazard for flood inundation due <br /> to a levee or damn failure than any other site within Pleasanton. Some of the proposed routes, like most <br /> of Pleasanton, are within the Del Valle Dam Flood inundation area. <br /> No Impact. The proposed Master Plan would not cause any hydrology or water quality impacts. No <br /> wastewater discharge would occur due to the addition of trails, bicycle routes, and sidewalks. The <br /> planning, construction and use of additional paths and trails would not result in the depletion of any <br /> groundwater resources. <br /> The proposed Master Plan includes trails, bicycle routes, and sidewalks that are located within the 100 <br /> year flood zone that could be impacted by some flooding, although such flooding would not be <br /> considered potentially significant. No structures, either residential or otherwise, are planned to be <br /> constructed within this flood zone. There is no risk of seiche, tsunami, or mudflow within Pleasanton <br /> because it is located inland. <br /> Les✓ Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> 9. Land Use and Planning Would the project: <br /> a) Physically divide an established community? I I X <br /> b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or I X I <br /> regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project <br /> (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, <br /> local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the <br /> purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or I X <br /> natural community conservation plan? <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> The current pedestrian and bicycle trail system in Pleasanton is located throughout Pleasanton and intra- <br /> connects much of the community. <br /> Revised 9/4/09 22 9/4/24)09 <br />