14 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Initial Study routes. Many of these people would othenvisc travel in automobiles and be subject to similar hazards, although some trail users may be additional people drawn to the area. The increased usage that may result from improvements to the pedestrian and bicycle circulation system would be a minor increase and would therefore be considered less than significant. The amount of excavation required for construction of bicycle routes, sidewalks, the trails due to the Master Plan's implementation would be minimal. Any potential impact would be mitigated by application of the Pleasanton Municipal Code and the Alameda County Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program regulations. Erosion would be a less than significant impact. No Impact. Sanitary sewers serve the project vicinity and development resulting from the proposed Master Plan would not involve the proposed use of septic systems. Lem Than Significant Potentially Impact With Las Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the project:: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 1 I X environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the Li X x environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely [1 1 X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of LJ X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, I X I where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, I I I X I would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 1 1 X 1 I adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Li X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Revised 9/4/09 18 u/4/2N9