Laserfiche WebLink
a posted disclosure of a licensed or non licensed facility. She indicated that she <br /> recalled the Commission modifying a policy that allowed facilities with 20 or less <br /> students to obtain their zoning permits over the counter. She noted that the City had <br /> granted some by error because of where the business was going to locate and <br /> suggested incorporating a 24 -hour "cooling -off period" prior to granting over the counter <br /> approvals to avoid any potential problems. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor agreed with most of what has been discussed and <br /> emphasized the need for the Commission to understand the unintended consequences <br /> before moving forward. He added that once this is known, he believes the Commission <br /> would guide the process by how it defines child care in terms of number of children, <br /> hours, etc. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor then referred to City liability and requested Ms. Harryman to <br /> address this issue should the City impose a higher standard than the State. <br /> Ms. Harryman stated that she sees this as two separate issues: (1) The City can have <br /> higher standards. An applicant; however, may make the opposite argument and feel <br /> they are pre empted, as the State has occupied the field on when licensing is and is not <br /> required. She stated that she was not certain if there was case law on this, but the <br /> City's position is that it can impose the requirement for health and safety reasons as has <br /> been done in the past. (2) Liability is a separate issue. She stated that once the City <br /> takes on a more active role in criminal background checks or those items listed in <br /> Exhibit B, from an exposure standpoint, the City may get sued if a child is injured; but <br /> when the case is litigated, the City has certain governmental immunities that would <br /> protect it. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the exposure was due to the City processing <br /> background checks as opposed to the State processing. <br /> Ms. Harryman replied that in Option A, staff is suggesting that the State process <br /> background checks, as they are trained to investigate complaints. She noted that if the <br /> City takes a more active role in this, it would increase its exposure. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that background checks are done frequently in private <br /> industry. He stated that there are five levels of background checks from having a <br /> driver's license to higher security levels but that he did not envision the City doing the <br /> background checks. <br /> Ms. Harryman explained that what staff is proposing is that the applicant self certify, <br /> which can have shortcomings. She added that any crimes or convictions of a sexual <br /> nature will obviously be an immediate disqualification for someone to obtain a permit, <br /> whereas other crimes may or may not be disqualifiers, depending on the nature of the <br /> crime and when it occurred. She noted that these areas will raise many more questions <br /> for staff to figure out. <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 8, 2009 Page 7 of 12 <br />