My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
090109
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2009 2:02:02 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/1/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor inquired if they would not need a Conditional Use <br /> Permit (CUP) unless they fell outside proper zoning. <br /> Ms. Stern stated if they fell outside a child care use, they may or may not require a <br /> CUP, depending on what the use is. She added, as an example, that martial arts for <br /> over 20 children would require a CUP. <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired if a business located in the Valley Business Park, even if <br /> they were under 20 children, would still need a CUP because they would be subject to <br /> zoning regulations for a PUD. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that was correct because a CUP is required under that PUD zoning <br /> designation. <br /> Commissioner Narum requested Ms. Stern to comment on the difference between the <br /> age listed in Exhibit A and the age listed in Exhibit B. <br /> Ms. Stern confirmed they should both be listed as "15 years and under." <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired why "15 years and under" was chosen as opposed to 17 <br /> or 12 years, or something else. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that staff initially considered all children who are minors, i.e., under <br /> 18 years, but generally the uses will all fall at 15 years and under. She added that it <br /> would seem superfluous to regulate 17- year -olds. <br /> Julie Harryman stated that the Planning Commission has been imposing the <br /> sign -in /sign -out requirement on businesses that provide child care. She explained that <br /> if the Commission chooses Option A and requires State licensing, the State also has in <br /> its regulations provisions for sign -in /sign -out policies, which means that the City would <br /> not have to require this on top of the State requirement. She noted that the State's <br /> requirement is not age- specific. <br /> Commissioner Olson requested a definition of a heritage school. <br /> Ms. Stern stated that a heritage school is generally a school where a different language <br /> other than English is taught. She elaborated that the school teaches language classes <br /> as well as the culture of that particular heritage. She indicated that she did not know <br /> that any particular heritage would be necessarily included or excluded, and legislation <br /> would require some sort of association which would develop standards for background <br /> checks and other requirements. <br /> Chair Pearce said there was a concern raised about managing complaints if the <br /> Commission chose Option B. She asked how complaints are managed now for exempt <br /> child care. Mr. Dolan said he believes complaints are generally limited to traffic and <br /> noise and not child safety issues. <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 8, 2009 Page 3 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.