My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN022106
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN022106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2009 10:45:10 AM
Creation date
8/24/2009 10:45:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN022106
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ability to make a left -turn while pedestrians are crossing, which is where there could be a <br /> potential issue. <br /> 6c <br /> Adopt a resolution to amend Resolution 03 -008 to restate Council's direction to staff and <br /> provide greater flexibility in determining Happy Valley Bypass Road options and <br /> establish a blue ribbon committee to identify Happy Valley Bypass Road options. <br /> (SR 06:035) <br /> This item was continued by staff to March 7, 2006. <br /> 6d <br /> Resolution amending Master Fee Schedule concerning Taxi Cab rates. (SR 06:061) <br /> Tim Neal, Police Chief, presented the staff report. <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked if the neighboring cities regulated the number of taxicab <br /> companies? <br /> Mr. Neal said the Cities of Hayward and Oakland regulates the number of taxicab <br /> companies. The Cities of Dublin and Fremont do not regulate the number of taxicab companies <br /> and the City of Livermore has an arduous permit process that tends to restrict the number of <br /> applicants. Some communities regulate taxicab companies by requiring a minimum number of <br /> taxicabs in order to serve a community; the reason is to provide a full taxicab service. <br /> Ms. McGovern said she was worried that a portion of the cost of the proposed increase <br /> is the statement that there is an increased number of taxicab companies operating in <br /> Pleasanton and not sufficient fares to cover these taxicabs, which she did not believe was <br /> proper to pass on to the residents of this community. She pointed out that the City is not using <br /> supply and demand to regulate the number of taxicabs. <br /> Mr. Neal did not disagree with Ms. McGovern's logic. He pointed out that Pleasanton is <br /> an extremely lucrative taxicab market and there is a reason why Pleasanton has 68 taxicabs <br /> serving Pleasanton. The City of Pleasanton is not only a BART destination but also Stoneridge <br /> Mall and Hacienda Business Park in and of themselves is tremendously lucrative to the taxicab <br /> industry. If Council were to retain the current rates or reduce the rates, some of the taxicab <br /> companies would go out of business, and some businesses would argue that if Council did not <br /> increase the rates they would not be able to sustain a business. He noted that a past Council <br /> made the decision not to regulate the number of taxicab companies and let the market itself <br /> regulate the taxicab service in Pleasanton. <br /> Ms. McGovern did not see how the City could control the amount of taxicab companies <br /> that would want to conduct business in Pleasanton if the City had the highest rates. <br /> Mr. Sullivan asked why cities regulate the taxicab rates. <br /> Mr. Neal said there needed to be some type of cap on the flag drop fee and the per mile <br /> rate which if not regulated would go unchecked. <br /> Pleasanton City Council 23 02/21/06 <br /> Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.