Laserfiche WebLink
time to determine and report that those actions have been taken. He asked that, in the name of <br /> fairness and transparency, the Council consider reviewing those rules and incorporating the <br /> recommendations of other municipalities' Fair Political Practices Commissions. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed pubic comment. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan voiced support for the policies and programs which reinforce economic <br /> development of the downtown area. He noted that at the workshop, Council had requested a more <br /> strategic approach or visioning process specific to the downtown area and asked that it be made <br /> clear in the Work Plan. <br /> Mayor Hosterman concurred, adding that she envisioned a process wherein the Council would have <br /> the opportunity to discuss the downtown area's evolution with the public, property owners, and <br /> merchants. She asked if staff sees that as pertaining to the protection and enhancement of <br /> Pleasanton's Quality of Life goals. <br /> Mr. Fialho agreed that there was considerable discussion about visioning at the downtown level. He <br /> felt that the economic visioning is captured on the priority list but suggested that the intent be <br /> clarified on Work Plan Page A6, subcategory Downtown, under Downtown Specific Plan <br /> Implementation and Outreach. He proposed that the project description state the intent to engage <br /> with various stakeholders in the downtown area to pursue a collaborative visioning process. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan supported the recommendation provided that the description can be <br /> broadened to apply to more than just design guidelines. Mr. Fialho agreed to adjust it accordingly. <br /> Mayor Hosterman shared her pleasure with the Work Plan which the City Council and staff worked <br /> collectively to provide the people of Pleasanton with so many wonderful CIP projects. Despite some <br /> very serious budget constraints, they can continue to offer new and exciting programs. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan referred to Mr. Carroll's comments, voiced support for further review, and <br /> cited the meeting minutes of January 15, 2008 which states the intent to do just that. He asked that <br /> the Council follow through on its agreement to review the Fair Campaign Practices Code and that <br /> the review and any resulting policy changes be in place prior to the next election cycle. <br /> Councilmember McGovern concurred that the minutes do reflect an agreement to conduct at least <br /> one review and requested that they do so in order to address any concerns that were not <br /> sufficiently covered by the adopted Code. <br /> Mayor Hosterman reiterated her thoughts from the workshop, stating that the Council implemented <br /> a number of new programs with respect to fair campaign practices and that as a result, she has not <br /> heard any public rumblings relative to the outcome of the last election at least in so far as the <br /> finance campaign process goes. She noted that the Council has numerous issues to address in the <br /> upcoming months and suggested that they forego this review for now unless the community <br /> requests otherwise. <br /> Vice -Mayor Cook- Kallio shared her impressions of that meeting, stating that she presumed the <br /> review pertained primarily to expenditure limits. She recognized that independent expenditures may <br /> be an issue but agreed that the Council has plenty to deal with at this time. <br /> Councilmember Thorne concurred. He shared his hesitance to deal with independent expenditures <br /> as they fall under first amendment rights and doubted that the Council possesses the ability to <br /> control those expenditures any more than it has already. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 11 June 2, 2009 <br />