Laserfiche WebLink
6. E -mail from Councilmember Cindy McGovern <br /> 6.1 The designation was applied to the entire business park for a couple of reasons. First, there <br /> was a recognition that Hacienda, on a macro scale, is currently a mixed -use development <br /> since it incorporates office, retail /commercial, research and development uses, as well as <br /> 1,530 residential units, a middle school, and public parks. There was also the thought that <br /> although the City could specifically designate the areas currently under consideration for <br /> residential development /mixed use, there could be additional sites which could support <br /> mixed -use development. The larger area provides the City Council with flexibility to <br /> consider additional projects within the residential cap, and also articulates a broader goal of <br /> creating a sense of place in the business park and making the area more pedestrian and bike <br /> friendly. <br /> To review, the Mixed Use designation, as described in the proposed General Plan Land Use <br /> Element, allows any combination of business park, office, retail, hotel and other <br /> commercial uses, community facilities, research and development, and residential uses in a <br /> single building, on a single site or on adjacent sites where the uses are integrated and include <br /> a functional interrelationship and a coherent physical design. Higher density residential uses <br /> (30 units per acre or more) are encouraged in locations proximate to BART stations, and <br /> other areas near transit, although such residential development is not precluded in other <br /> areas designated Mixed Use." Therefore, although residential development may be allowed <br /> in the entire area and encouraged in certain locations, by no means is it assumed that <br /> residential development would be part of all future mixed -use development. <br /> Staff agrees with the commenter that not all areas in Hacienda may be appropriate for <br /> residential development. <br /> 6.2 The proposed General Plan would redesignate the Applied Biosystems site from General <br /> and Limited Industrial to Business Park. This change is being proposed because the <br /> Business Park designation better reflects the Applied Biosystems development compared to <br /> the General and Limited Industrial designation. The redesignation of the site to Business <br /> Park would result in no physical change to the site and it would not allow more development <br /> than the current Planned District approval allows. Applied Biosystems, like any owner, <br /> could sell its property or could apply to modify its development approvals. The approval of <br /> any future development would be guided by the description of a Business Park in the <br /> proposed General Plan (p. 2 -24) which states: "Intended primarily to accommodate high <br /> quality, campus -like development, including administrative, professional office, and research <br /> uses. Retail commercial uses are limited to those primarily serving the business park <br /> employees." Because the site is zoned Planned District, any new proposal would be subject <br /> to City Council approval. <br /> 6.3 This designation can certainly be added to the list of land uses being considered in East <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> 6.4 See response 6.1, above. Although it is a general a rule of thumb that Transit Oriented <br /> Development should be located within a half -mile of a transit center, the proposed General <br /> Plan (which designates land as Mixed Use rather than Transit Oriented Development) does <br /> not include such a restriction. <br /> final response to comments with throw pages 29 <br />