20 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

4. Letter from Paul White, Director of Real Estate, Kiewit Construction Company 4.1 The description on Table 2 -2 does include Industrial Park. It does not include residential (or public and institutional uses) because the table describes existing and future commercial, office and industrial development. 4.2 See answer 2.1, above. 4.3 Staff recommends that any specific designation of the site for residential or other land use is deferred until adoption of a Specific Plan for the East Side. 4.4 This is an issue that should be discussed as part of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan process. 4.5 As noted on p. 3 -38, the City of Pleasanton does not support high -speed rail running through Pleasanton. It may be appropriate to discuss this issue as part of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan process; however, staff does not recommend any change to the proposed General Plan at this time. 4.6 If the City Council agrees, the Medium Density land use designation can be added to the East Pleasanton Specific Plan Area potential uses. Staff will bring this request to the Planning Commission's and City Council's attention. 4.7 As noted throughout the text, development assumptions are "placeholders" only for the East Pleasanton area. The appropriate number of residential units will be determined through the Specific Plan process and staff does not recommend any change to the proposed General Plan or the EIR at this time. 4.8 Although the Kiewit site is no longer specifically designated as General and Limited Industrial, that land use designation is shown in the "capsule" which includes all the potential land uses for the East Pleasanton Area. I -G -40 is a zoning designation and is not referenced in the proposed General Plan. 4.9 See answer 4.3, above. 4.10 See answer 4.6, above. 4.11 See answer 4.6, above. 4.12 See answer 4.5, above. 4.13 See answer 4.6, above. 4.14 See answer 4.7, above. Final response to comments with throw pages 22