Laserfiche WebLink
COX CASTLE NICHO LSO N Cox. Cause3tNichu[sun <br /> 141 Caifnrnia Street, 1 tC dram <br /> F;Arrciao, California 94104-1113 <br /> F 411.342.42510 F 4[5.342.4210 <br /> Mar N. SWIM, <br /> 41S 2(42. 5100 <br /> mFndulsrT'crracauk.usm <br /> November 24, 2008 Hit No. ste64 <br /> Ms. Janie. Stern LETTER 2 <br /> Principal Planner <br /> Community Development Department <br /> an/ o' Pleasanton <br /> P.CJ. fox 520 <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> RlirtgAUVIAtg <br /> Mr- 13, Dolan <br /> Direct 3r ofCommunity Development NOV 2 6 zoo <br /> Cornn tun iry Development Department <br /> City o•" Pleasanton CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> P.O, fox 52l? <br /> PLANNING; DIVISION <br /> Pleasanton, CA. 94566 <br /> Re: City of Pleasanton General Plan Update and DrafeEnyironmentthwpact Report <br /> Dear Ms. Stern and AAr. Dolan: <br /> We write on behalf of our client, Legacy Partners Commercial, LLC ("Legacy <br /> regard rig the City's Draft General Plan ("Draft General Plan and relayed Draft Environmental <br /> lmpac: Report (DEIR Legacy owns a substantial portion of the property located within the area <br /> design iced as the future East Pleasanton Specific flan arra. <br /> Land t Tse Designation Pending At. S r <br /> We undctsrand that the City intends to defer the planning for tilt Fast Pleasanton <br /> Specifi Plan .uca until more detailed plans are developed. It is u nclear. however, what land use <br /> designation wtil apply to this a rea between the adoption of the Draft General flan and she adoption <br /> of the future specific plan. In order to eliminate this ambiguity, we request. that the City include a 2.1 <br /> statement in the General Plan that the existing land use designations continue to apply until the <br /> future specific plan is adopted. This approach will preserve the status quo and ensure that there is <br /> no question that currently permitted tries continue to he allowed. <br /> General Plat Average Densities Used for /folding Capacity <br /> The Draft General Plan, in Table 2.3, provides atlnwahlc density ranges and includes <br /> assure d average densities for holding capacity for commercial /office of .351'5 FAR. general limited 2.2 <br /> industrial of 3 1 ih FAR, and business park of 32% FAR. While the allowable denstry ranges appear <br />