Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />Significant Effects and Findings <br />For purposes of this Exhibit, the Hacienda Business Park <br />is referred to as the "Project" and the Amendment to the Growth <br />Management Element is referred to as the "Amendment The Pro- <br />ject conditions have been incorporated into the Amendment by <br />adoption of a policy that requires feasible mitigation measures <br />be adopted in conjunction with project approvals made pursuant to <br />this Amendment. <br />I. Land Use and Planning. <br />A. Significant Effect. Potential regional surplus of <br />land committed to commercial /industrial development <br />resulting in delay in project buildout or abandonment <br />of project in partially built state. <br />a.1 Finding. Phasing of project development is <br />infeasible due to economic considerations. <br />a.2 Fact. Allowing Developer to develop and market <br />the Project as market conditions dictate will <br />minimize the likelihood of delay in project <br />buildout or abandonment of the Project in a <br />partially built state. Different uses are <br />located throughout the Project making phased <br />development impractical. <br />a.3 Fact. The Project is located at the inter- <br />section of I -580 and I -580, an area well suited <br />for large scale urban infill and more likely <br />than less favored locations to build -out as <br />scheduled. <br />a.4 Fact. The notion of phased project development <br />is inconsistent with City's requirement that the <br />public improvements related to the Project be <br />built in one phase. <br />a.5 Finding. The Residential Community Alternative, <br />Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No <br />Project Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the potential signi- <br />ficant effect. However, each of these Alterna- <br />tives is infeasible. <br />1. <br />