Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT "B" <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2380 <br />OCTOBER 26, 1983 <br />CASE GP -83 -1 <br />Wording to be incorporated in the Growth Management Element <br />immediately before Policy 6 which appears on Page 6 <br />"The following principles shall guide the interpretation <br />of Goal 1 of the Growth Management Element: <br />Additional commercial, office and industrial development <br />is desirable to correct the continuing shortage of available <br />employment opportunities for the local regional workforce. <br />The City of Pleasanton shall endeavor to provide employment <br />opportunities within the City for present and future <br />residents. From time to time, housing supply may exceed <br />jobs, or jobs may exceed housing supply. To that extent, <br />the City could be, at various points in time, a net <br />labor importing community, requiring some amount of <br />incommuting. <br />It is recognized that approval of well planned, long -range <br />commercial, office and industrial projects provides <br />the necessary infrastructure for creation of desired <br />future employment opportunities. To the extent that <br />the GME requires consideration of the relationship between <br />projected employment from such projects and projected <br />housing supply, the relationship is hereby clarified <br />to permit the additional employment opportunities projected <br />within Pleasanton as a result of the commercial, office <br />and industrial projects approved as of May of 1983, <br />together with the project shown in the proposed PUD -81 -30 <br />(Hacienda Business Park). <br />The commercial, office and industrial development described <br />above is a necessary and positive step toward achieving <br />a balance among land uses as called for by Goal 1 of <br />the Growth Management Element and would be compatible <br />with the present and future workforce of Pleasanton <br />because of the following factors: <br />a. The need for progress toward correcting the current <br />severe imbalance in favor of housing; <br />b. The uncertainty as to whether economic trends <br />and competitive factors will allow buildout of <br />the subject projects at the projected rate; <br />c. The compatibility of the subject projects with <br />job skills of the present and future workforce <br />of Pleasanton; <br />d. Established regional economic and commuting patterns <br />and the loction of the described projects in <br />close proximity to major regional transportation <br />corridors, which will result in a significant <br />number of workers who prefer to work in the City <br />and to live elsewhere and in a dispersion of <br />employment effects of the described projects <br />