2380 - Laserfiche WebLink

XI. Archaeology. Significant Effect. Potential disturbance of known archaeological sites and /or disturbance of unknown sites in areas of high archaeological sensitivity. Finding. The mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated in the Project will cause the effect to be avoided. Fact. Conditions Nos. 100 and 101 require the Developer to do the following: (1) Evaluation of the extent and location of two archaeological sites by qualified archaeologists. (2) Availability of a qualified archaeologist available on site during construction activities. (3) Construction activity shall be halted in the event that human remains and artifacts are encountered until an evaluation and removal to alternative sites can be completed or some other method of pro- tecting these materials can be accom- plished. (4) A layer of fill material shall be applied to historical sites, where necessary, to prevent disruption of the layer of archaeological deposit. XII. Alternatives. The individual Alternatives to the Amend- ment and the Project identified in the Draft EIR have been analyzed herein. The Alternatives to the Amendment are the No Project Alternative to the Amendment, the Tri- Valley Employment Center Alternative, the Increased Resi- dential Capacity Alternative, the Residential Community Alternative and the Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative. The Alternatives to the Project are the No Approval of Project Alternative, Partial Approval Alter- native and Mixed Used Alternative. The Monitoring of Development Alternative is an alternative to both the Project and the Amendment. In addition to the preceding findings and analyses, the City finds as follows: 19.