2341 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2341 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON APPROVING PUD- DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR GUS ENTERPRISES AND PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD -83 -13 WHEREAS, GUS Enterprises and Prudential Insurance Company have applied for PUD (Planned Unit Development) development plan approval of an approximately 105,998 sq. ft. hotel and related facilities including a 468 seat restaurant on an approximately seven acre site located at the northeast corner of Hopyard Road and Gibraltar Drive; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PrD (Planned Unit Development) C -F (Commercial Freeway) District; and WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of July 27, 1983, the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, pertinent documents and recommendations made by the City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. Based upon the Initial Study, the Planning Commission finds, pursuant to Section 15068 of the State CEQA Guidelines, that the cumulative environmental effects of this project are similar in nature to those discussed in the Hacienda Business Park PUD EIR and that the Hacienda Business Park PUD EIR adequately covers the environmental impacts of this project. Section 2. To the extent that there were any potentially significant environmental effects of this discrete project, the conditions of approval and measures undertaken since the completion of the Hacienda Business Park PUD EIR have reduced such impacts to insignificant levels. Section 3. With respect to the cumulative effects of continuing building by building development, the Planning Commission finds that prior to the development of the entire area discussed in the Hacienda Business Park PUD EIR, an amendment to the Growth Management Element of the General Plan would have to be approved by the City. Section 4. With respect to the cumulative effects of continuing building by building development the Planning Commission further finds that potentially significant environmental effects either (1) have been mitigated by project conditions of approval or modifications made to the project during the review process, (2) require mitigation by another public agency having jurisdiction, or (3) cannot be mitigated except by mitigation measures or alternatives found to be infeasible