My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN042109
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
CCMIN042109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2009 12:33:08 PM
Creation date
6/4/2009 11:35:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/21/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmember McGovern asked staff to describe and show her the condition that clearly states <br />students are to wait in the waiting room, which is supposed to be contained in condition 12. She <br />said it talks about signing in and out but it does not indicate they must wait. Ms. Seto noted Item 10 <br />on page 2 of 3 of the conditions; “Under no circumstances shall patrons or instructors loiter on <br />neighboring properties. Patrons and instructors shall utilize the waiting area inside the facility or the <br />area directly in front of the studio suite.” She said the condition could be modified to strike the last <br />phrase of the sentence. Councilmember McGovern supported the requirement for parents, students <br />and teachers be made to wait inside the facility. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio acknowledged the safety concern, but it is probably not common for groups <br />of children to run in the parking lot, but said it most likely happened at one point. This sort of service <br />when dealing with a 30-minute window does not lend itself to leaving children unattended. In most <br />cases, classes will also occur after business hours of surrounding businesses. She thinks the owner <br />has tried to address the issue by having parents sign the forms acknowledging rules and <br />regulations, understands the struggles between the different uses and feels the owner has gone out <br />of her way to ensure people understand there is an issue. If there has to be parking on the street, <br />the only time parking might be impacted is the period between 3-5:00 PM when people are getting <br />off work and leaving the area, but there are only 3 teachers who would be teaching and she did not <br />believe there was a parking issue, particularly after 4:30 p.m. She also agrees the language in the <br />ordinance needs to be cleaned up, thinks it is a valuable use, thinks it is not as simple as saying <br />one should rent somewhere else. The issue regarding children taking classes in the summer prior <br />to 3PM is somewhat addressed by the 3 teachers who could teach, and she noted currently 2 of the <br />teachers take public transit, but this could change. She voiced her support for the request, thinks <br />many of the instances cited were unique and when a complaint has been made, there have been <br />attempts to address them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thorne acknowledged the start and stop times, but this should not have any impact <br />on the studio’s business model, agrees the City needs to clean up the terminology of trade schools, <br />given past practices, there are businesses operating that are not trade schools, thinks Condition 10 <br />should be modified to require people to wait in a waiting room and look at the CC&R’s to clarify <br />whether or not on-street parking is allowed, and he made this in the form of a motion. <br /> <br />MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Hosterman to deny the appeal and support the Planning <br />Commission’s recommendations to the City Council with amendment to Condition 10; patrons of the <br />studio are required to wait in the waiting room; and for staff to clarify whether the CC&R’s restrict <br />the use of on-street parking. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman said she did not want to limit instruction and supported the Planning <br />Commission’s decision, and she would prefer to allow as many instructors as the applicant needs <br />up to 5 for flexible hours. Councilmember Thorne agrees the business should be able to reach its <br />maximum potential, and he accepted the friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman believes the applicant has addressed safety in the parking lot for students and <br />families through requiring sign-in, parent education, and addressing the concerns of park owners. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sullivan said he thinks the music studio is a great cultural enrichment opportunities <br />for children, but disagreed with having them only in Pleasanton. He said he thinks Mr. Studzinski’s <br />business is also needed in Pleasanton as it provides a tax base for the City, good jobs, jobs that <br />people can make a living at, and he thinks the City has a narrow definition of economic <br />development, which is primarily housing development and getting more cars into town and this <br />discussion should be broadened to address sustainable jobs for the economy. He is concerned that <br /> <br />City Council Minutes Page 15 of 20 April 21, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.