Laserfiche WebLink
taken by Such other agencies. If taken, such actions would avoid or substz.-~tially lessen <br /> the significant effect identified in the Final EIR. <br /> <br /> Rationale for Finding: The efforts of the water purveyors in the area will allow for <br /> efficient provision of water for the area. Mitigation measures such as phasing of <br /> development and requiting water conservation features to be implemented will help to <br /> ensure that water is used efficiently. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACT: SCHOOLS <br /> <br />IMPACT: Incx'~ts~ population due to new development adds to the pressure on local school <br />districts. FgrR page 13-6. <br /> <br /> Mitigation Measure 13.3-2: Approval of the Kottinger Hills project shall be contingent <br /> upon satisfactory enrollment capacity. The applicants shall participate-in an equitable <br /> funding plan established by the Pleasanton Unified School District. <br /> <br /> Ei~aixlg: Such actions are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public <br /> agency and not the City of Pleasanton. Such actions can and should be taken by such <br /> other agencies. If taken, such actions would avoid or substantially lessen the significant <br /> effect identified in the Final EIR. <br /> <br /> Rationale for Finding,: The proposed funding plan will provide a mechanism for financing <br /> necessary school facilities to serve new residents. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACT: VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE <br /> <br />IMPACT 13.4B: 'There is a continuing loss of existing vegetation and wildlife habitat to urban <br />development in the area. FEIR page 13-7. <br /> <br /> Mifi~,ation Measure 13.4-1: Continue requirements for replacement or restoration of <br /> weftands and other critical habitat. FEIR page 13-7. <br /> <br /> F_iaaj~: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incbrporated into, the project. <br /> Howevex, the changes or alterations required in, or incorporated into the project would <br /> not reduce the project' s contribution to this impact to a level of insignificance. Therefore, <br /> a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the project. <br /> <br /> Rationale for Finding: The mitigation measures of the E1R, and the ongoing requirements <br /> of the City and other agencies, would reduce the magnitude of this loss. However, the <br /> project by itself would create an un~.' '?idahie adverse impact on vegetation and wildlife, <br /> and this individual project impact -.-,ould combine with other projects in the area to <br /> produce an unavoidable cumulative impact. <br /> <br /> 18 <br /> <br /> <br />