My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1765
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1701 - 1800
>
ORD 1765
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:24:23 PM
Creation date
3/8/1999 5:05:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1765
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance No. 1765 <br />Page 5 <br />the Traffic Development Fee Report, General Plan, and Capital Improvement Program, <br />the need for which has been partially generated by new development. <br /> <br />6. It is the intent of the City Council to adopt a fair and equitable method of securing <br />some of the necessary revenues to fund the acquisition of property and construction of the <br />necessary traffic improvements. <br /> <br />7. With regard to the methodology for levying the Traffic Development Fee, the City <br />Council further finds that: <br /> <br /> A. The traffic improvements necessary to serve existing and new residences, <br /> businesses and their employees at build out have been cataloged in the Traffic <br /> Development Fee Report ("Report"), dated September 1998, attached to the <br /> Staff Report dated October 20, 1998. The City Council finds the list of traffic <br /> improvements to be reasonably necessary to meet the future demands <br /> generated by new vehicle trips at build-out based upon current and projected <br /> use pattems and demands compiled as part of the City's baseline traffic studies <br /> and other computer models. <br /> <br /> B. The estimated costs for the traffic improvements have been based upon <br /> current construction costs for similar improvements for which the City has <br /> recently received construction bids, Cal Trans estimated costs, or construction <br /> costs calculated based upon similar improvements in other jurisdictions. The <br /> City Council finds that these methods for estimating the costs of construction <br /> are reasonably based upon current construction costs. <br /> <br /> C. The Land Use Element of the Pleasanton General Plan specifies the permitted <br /> uses of land within the City and places limits on the intensity and density of <br /> such uses. The City Council has reviewed the relationship between land uses <br /> and densities permitted under the General Plan and the rate and amount of <br /> actual development of property within the City. The City Council has <br /> identified trends in growth and development which enable the Council to <br /> project, with accuracy, the magnitude and extent of future development based <br /> upon the City's General Plan at projected build-out. <br /> <br /> D. The City Council has also examined the extent to which different land uses <br /> generate different numbers of peak hour trips, and subsequently demands for <br /> traffic improvements. The City Council has assumed that new development <br /> will contribute traffic at substantially the same rate per unit or square foot as <br /> similar types of existing development. The City Council finds that the peak <br /> hour trips are a reasonable estimation of actual demands for traffic <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.