My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/27/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 10/27/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:33:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/27/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/27/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
o <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />(iii) adopted a project-average FAR for small-lot prototypes of 55% rather than using FAR <br /> maximums. <br />Modified the Growth Management Agreement to reflect a phasing schedule updated to conform <br />to project approval timeframe. <br />Modified the Specific Plan and PUD Conditions/Development Standards and Design Guidelines <br />to specify that five-story buildings are not encouraged and are allowed only if architecturally <br />compatible with the Village Center design concept. <br />Modified the Specific Plan and PUD Conditions to require the golf course to be constructed in <br />the initial project phase and to specify that "cost-effective" reclaimed water is the equivalent of <br />potable water cost. <br />Modified the PUD Conditions to: <br />(i) increase park improvement initial caps to $143,000/acre for neighborhood parks and <br /> $160,000/acre for the community park; <br />(ii) required lighted fields to be in place before adjoining residential area are built; and <br />(iii) explore the feasibility of increasing the community park to 35 acres. A determination as <br /> to whether to increase the park size should be completed prior to approval of the MVTM. <br />Modified the PUD Conditions to specify that: <br />(i) total units allowed in the project be reduced pro rata for any public or quasi-public use <br /> larger than two acres; and <br />(ii) should any new public land use component be included in any agency's master plan <br /> within the project boundaries, a project redesign will be required showing such use in <br /> conjunction with planned private uses, with a corresponding pro rata reduction in <br /> development intensity for the loss of private development land. <br />Modified the Specific Plan, PUD Development Plan, Conditions, Development Standards and <br />Design Guidelines, and Development Agreement to: <br />(i) widen connector streets by two feet; <br />(ii) eliminate the Case Avenue-Junipero round-about and replace it with a traffic signal; and <br />(iii) require review of Bemal Avenue traffic LOS as part of a stage, discretionary review of <br /> project impacts/mitigations as the project develops. <br />Modified the PUD Conditions and associated agreements to eliminate caps on local and regional <br />fees. <br />Modified the Development Agreement to add an obligation for San Francisco to explore water <br />options with Tri-Valley agencies. <br />Modified the PUD Conditions to strongly encourage use of "environmental Principles for Golf <br />Management: when developing the golf course management program. <br />Modified the Development Agreement and PUD Conditions so that, should school fees (assumed <br />to apply through build-out of the project) not be needed for school facilities and not be otherwise <br />payable to the Pleasanton Unified School District for school purposes under a San Francisco- <br />PUSD agreement, an equivalent fee amount will be payable to the City to be used for yonth- <br />related programs. <br />Modified the PUD Conditions to require fire mitigation (sprinklers) for any unit outside the then- <br />existing five-minute response zone or have San Francisco fund the fire station consistent with its <br />first building outside the existing five-minute response time. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6 October 27, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.