My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/27/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 10/27/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:33:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/27/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/27/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SP-95-02~ PUD-96-06, San Francisco Water Department Bernal Property <br />The San Francisco Water Department Bemal Property is an approximately 51 O-acre site <br />consisting of three basic land units: a 202-acre Western Parcel between Interstate 680 (I-680) <br />and the Arroyo de la Laguna south of Bernal Avenue; a triangular-shaped Central Parcel of <br />approximately 245 acres bounded by 1-680 on the southwest, Bernal Avenue on the north, and by <br />the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right-of- way on the southwest; and an Eastern Parcel of <br />about 63 acres between the UPRR and the Alameda County Transportation Corridor (formerly <br />the South Pacific Railroad right-of-way) south of Junipero Avenue. <br /> <br />The project is comprised of a number of land use approvals which together make up the project, <br />as follows: <br />· Approval of the Bemal Property Specific Plan for the 51 O-acre site to allow development of <br /> up to 1,900 residential units, up to 755,000 square feet of commemial/office space, an 18- <br /> hole golf course, parks, an elementary school, and associated uses. <br />· Approval of corresponding zoning actions as follows: <br />· Prezone the 439.7 acres of the Bemal Property in unincorporated Alameda County to <br /> Pleasanton's Planned Unit Development (PUD) District <br />· Rezone the approximately 70.3 acres of the Bernal Property already within the jurisdiction of <br /> the City of Pleasanton from I-P (Industrial Park) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br /> District. <br />· Rezone the one-acre parcel owned by the City of Pleasanton from I-P (Industrial Park) to P <br /> (Public and Institutional). <br />· Prezone the portion of the Alameda County Transportation Corridor to Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD) - Transportation Corridor. <br />· Prezone the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way to Planned Unit Development (PUD) - <br /> Transportation Corridor <br />· Approval of a comprehensive PUD Development Plan for the Bemal Property, incorporating <br /> Development Standards and Design Guidelines, to govern future development of the Bemal <br /> Property. <br />· Approval of the Preannexation Development Agreement, Growth Management Agreement, <br /> Bernal Interchange Construction and Reimbursement Agreement, Bernal Bridge <br /> Construction and City Consultant's Fees Agreement, Agreement for Conveyance of Real <br /> Estate - Park Expansion Parcel, Agreement for Conveyance of Real Estate -Civic Center <br /> Property, and Verona Road Agreement for the Bernal Property project. <br />· The Planning Commission will also consider certification of the Environmental Impact <br /> Report <br /> <br />Mr. Swift noted that this item is a continuation from the October 7, 1999 Commission meeting in which <br />the Commission certified the EIR and continued its consideration of the substance of the proposal to this <br />meeting. He referenced a staff report dated October 27, 1999 and highlighted key areas contained in the <br />report including background information, actions on the Bernal property project, and possible <br />modifications. In conclusion, he noted that staff's recommendation is that the Commission either deny <br />the project; or recommend approval of the project by making the findings as outlined earlier that the <br />project, as modified/conditioned (i) incorporates all feasible mitigation measures; (ii) has overriding <br />considerations for its approval notwithstanding the residual significant effects; (iii) is consistent with the <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 October 27, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.