PC 10/07/99 - Laserfiche WebLink

appreciation to the people who have expressed opinions on this matter and she noted she would encourage people to examine this test carefully and bring matters to the table when future testing occurs. She noted that the number of homes in the proposed project could be reduced if further testing indicated such. She stated that future testing will occur in the way the residents desire testing to occur supervised by independent agencies. She noted that the testing process was not meant to be a complete study; however, it has educated the Commission on what the study might include. Further, she requested that Tri-Valley CARE keep the Commission appraised of issues. In conclusion, she noted she would be in favor of certifying the EIR, with the condition that future thorough testing be performed. Discussion ensued relating to whether future testing will be contained in the CEQA process, and Mr. Swift noted that subsequent studies have the potential to give rise to future CEQA processes if additional new issues are discovered. Discussion ensued relating to conditioning the EIR that future testing take place at the time of any future grading, a comprehensive analysis being conducted of the entire Bernal site, the testing of the property being performed by the School Board, and the public not speaking in favor of approving the EIR. A motion was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Commissioner Kameny, that the final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; that the final EIR was presented to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR; and, the final EIR reflects Pleasanton's independent judgment analysis. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Kameny, Maas, and Chairperson Roberts NOES: Commission Kumaran and Sullivan ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. PC-99-69 was entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioner Arkin noted that he would have voted no on the motion if he would have had the opportunity. Commissioner Roberts noted that this matter will be continued to address issues of the PUD for this development. Mr. Roush suggested that this matter be continued to the October 27, 1999, Commission meeting. A motion was made by Commissioner Kameny, seconded by Commission Sullivan, that this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 27, 1999 for discussion of the PUD relating to the San Francisco Bernal property. Planning Commission Minutes October 7, 1999 Page 15