Laserfiche WebLink
Should additional grading be done in an effort to create a berm in order to screen the <br />homes? <br />Response: Discussed. No recommendation. <br /> <br />Does the amount of fill in the Alisal low density area preserve existing view corridors? <br />Response: Does not know; would need to see visuals. <br /> <br />Should the homes in the Alisal low density area be restricted to single-story height? <br />Response: Need to look at view corridors from various angles. Should be sensitive to <br />that area, but if at all possible, do not restrict the developer to single-story homes. <br /> <br />Is the proposed lot configuration appropriate? <br />Response: Unsure. <br /> <br />Should the lots adjacent to the by-pass road be redesigned to front on the by-pass road? <br />Response: Not a problem, need to look at fencing and landscaping. <br /> <br />Ms. Seto advised that the current schedule is for the application to come back to the Planning <br />Commission on October 13 for a decision on the PUD. It would go to the City Council for the first <br />hearing on October 19, in conjunction with various development agreements and all of the other golf <br />course-related issues. A special Council meeting is scheduled for October 26, in the event that these <br />projects are approved, for a second reading. <br /> <br />PUD-98-15, Mardel, LLC/Costas <br />Application for PUD development plan approval for a residential subdivision of an existing <br />4.17-acre site, including six building sites, a public equestrian/pedestrian trail, public <br />streets, and land area set aside for the future alignment of Vineyard Avenue. The property <br />is located at 2503 Vineyard Avenue between Vineyard Avenue and the Shadow Cliffs <br />Regional Recreation Area. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - <br />LDR (Low Density Residential Distric0. The Planning Commission will also consider the <br />Negative Declaration prepared for the application. <br /> <br />Continued to October 13, 1999. <br /> <br />RZ-98-03, City of Pleasanton <br />Application to amend the Pleasanton Municipal code by modifying the process for <br />reviewing second units. The Municipal Code amendment would allow the Zoning <br />Administrator to approve or deny a second unit after an administrative hearing and would <br />create development standards for second units in R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and R-M <br />(Multi-Family Residential) zoning districts. <br /> <br />Continued indefinitely. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 17 September 22, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />