My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/22/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 09/22/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:07:24 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:28:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/22/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/22/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. f. Are the number of lots appropriate? <br /> Response: Far too many. <br /> <br />Should the development standards be increased? <br />Response: Yes. <br /> <br />Medium-Density Residential - Custom Lots <br /> <br />Are these lots appropriate or should they be eliminated? <br />Response: Not fair to eliminate; they are appropriate for where they are. <br />move them to allow medium-density lots in a less visible area. <br /> <br />May want to <br /> <br />If the lots are appropriate, should the development standards be increased given the rural <br />character of the area and the significant site constraints? <br />Response: The lots are appropriate and the development standards should be increased. <br /> <br />Semi-Rural Density Residential District - Spotomo Flat Area <br /> <br />Are the development standards appropriate, should they match the HVSP? <br />Note: Mr. Champion stated that they can conform to the HVSP setbacks. <br /> <br />Should access to and from Alisal Street be limited to the one lot along Alisal? <br />Response: No, the only concern is with the golf course traffic. <br /> <br />Should the development standards be increased to match the development standards <br />proposed for the golf course's 20,O00-square-foot minimum lots. <br />Response: Yes, as close as possible. <br /> <br />Grading: <br /> <br />Is the amount of grading appropriate? <br />Response: No. (Would like to place fill in other locations.) <br /> <br />Should the number of lots be reduced in order to reduce the amount of excess dirt? <br />Response: Suggested reducing or moving lots. (Mr. Champion questioned if the <br />Planning Commission is willing to consider having lots from the medium-density <br />residential area placed in the flat area. The Commission advised that they would be <br />willing to look at a plan, with lots not being much smaller than the golf course lots.) <br /> <br />Visual. <br /> <br />Is the visual impact of the medium density area acceptable? <br />Response: No. <br /> <br />If it is not, should the amount of fill be reduced? <br />Response: Yes, whatever it takes <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 16 September 22, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.