PC 09/08/99 - Laserfiche WebLink

Rene Steinhauer, 5524 Oakmont Cimle, Livermore, noted he was involved in the meeting with the State and County health officials relating to the San Francisco Bernal property. He commented on the Radiological Characterization for the Bemal property report and noted, in his opinion, that the nuclear laundry involved heavier contamination other than just laundering lab coats. He noted that the Tri-Valley Citizens Against a Radioactive Environment, (CARE), will be issuing a report on further studies that need to be performed. He noted that Tri-Valley CARE is not an anti-growth or anti-science group, but a group interested in providing information to citizens of environmental issues. He requested that if Item No. 6.f. is going to be continued to a future meeting, that the Commission make a motion to remove Item No. 6.f. from tonight's agenda. 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Mr. Swift stated that Item No. 6.d., PUD-98-15, Mardel, LLC/Costas will be continued to the September 22, 1999, meeting; Item No. 6.e., RZ~98-03, City of Pleasanton has been continued to the September 22, 1999, meeting; and, Item No. 6.f., SP-95-02,PUD-96-06, San Francisco Water Department Bernal Property, has been continued to a future meeting. 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were none. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS UP-99-34, Etienne DeGroot Application for a conditional use permit for an approximately 693-square-foot attached second unit to the proposed residence located at 105 Via di Salerno. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - A/OS/LDR (Agriculture/Open Space/Low Density Residential) District. Mr. Plucker referenced a staff report dated September 8, 1999, and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background information, project description, and land use compatibility. In conclusion, he noted that stafCs recommendation is that the Commission approve Case UP-99-34 subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED The applicant noted he had nothing to add to staff's presentation. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Commission Sullivan noted he would be in favor of approving the application. Commissioner Maas noted she would be in favor of approving the application; however, she commented on the condition relating to the number of adults allowed in secondary units and inquired whether there was a condition for limitation for the number of children in a unit. Ms. Seto noted prior case law has PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 September 8, 1999