PC 07/16/99 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-99-49 was entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioner Sullivan stated that he has concerns about the Pleasanton Middle School site, as well as the existing sewage treatment plan/sewage ponds, and that he would like to see all of the sites tested immediately for radionuclide contamination. Chairperson Kumaran asked that the Commissioners express any information they would like to convey concerning the project. Commissioner Kameny suggested that the Commission proceed along with the applicant and receive information regarding ideas related to density, traffic signalization, and the Arroyo. He noted that he would like to keep the ball rolling and keep the dialogue open, even though the EIR has not been certified. Discussion ensued regarding the action of denying the EIR and the possibility of continuing with review of the project. Commissioner Roberts stated that her decision to deny certification of the EIR was not because she does not like the project. She commented that this is smart growth and there are many good things in this project. She noted that it is not perfectly integrated with the City of Pleasanton and within itself, and that compromise is necessary, for example she believes the Village Green is not in an ideal location. She noted that the project is infill, provides variety for future residents, and provides a lot of amenities which a lot of other people wanted (a golf course, lighted fields, affordable housing, etc.). She stated that the only problem is that the cumulative impacts of 1900 units is too much. She commented that as long as the fear around the radionuclides is out there, they will get no where in promoting the good aspects of this project. Commissioner Maas stated that she could support a cap of 1600 units (rather than the 1200 units she had previously expressed) with some percentages for mix. She stated that she computed the following amounts: 25% apartments, 10% townhomes, 35% for smaller lots (4,500 to 5,000 square feet), 20% medium lots (7,000 to 9,000 square feet), and 10% large lots (11,000 to 13,000 square feet, preferably around the golf course). She noted that this results in 1,600 units, but 239 acres. She commented that she believes the pluses out-weight the minuses, because the City has the power to review the project as it proceeds and slow down growth if necessary. She stated that she believes the project meets the General Plan and the community's standards, with the modifications that have been included, and that the mixture of types and styles of homes would make for a diverse community. She commented that she believes the Calthorpe idea would work in Pleasanton. She indicated that she would like the residents to see a model of the project and a timeline of the development phases, and meetings which residents can attend to find out exactly what is going on. Commissioner Sullivan stated that he takes issue with the "Summary of'Straw Vote' Actions" which is part of the staff report for this evening's meeting. He noted that the first paragraph states that Planning Commission generally came to a consensus ("straw votes") on its preferred resolution of these issues. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 11 July 16, 1999