My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/07/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 07/07/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:06:40 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 5:14:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/7/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/07/99
NOTES
BERNAL PROP PUBLIC HEARING
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
July12,1999 <br /> <br /> SUMMARY OF "STRAW VOTE" ACTIONS <br />(Taken at the July 7, 1999 Planning Commission Meeting) <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed each of the substantive issues/alternatives included <br />in Attachment 1 of the June 23, 1999 Staff Report (dated June 9, 1999) and g~ ca, roue <br />r. ama.4o a :~nsensu: ("straw vote")ton its preferred resolution of these issues. Staffs <br />interpretation of the majorit~ position is listed below. When the Planning <br />Commission position would result in a change to the proposed project (the various terms <br />of the "Initial Approvals"), that issue is designated with an asterisk (*). <br /> <br />* 1. Supported inclusion of a transit hub within the Village Center. <br /> <br />Supported Initial Approvals' treatment of residential uses within the Village <br />Center -- permitted but not mandatory. <br /> <br />* 3. <br /> <br />Supported reducing total units allowed, but no new limit was agreed upon. <br />Support was given for adjusting parcel-based ranges to coincide with a <br />lower limit, again with no agreed-upon recommendation. <br /> <br />Supported specifying product-mix ranges, given the reduced total, but no <br />actual percentage mix or ranges was agreed upon. <br /> <br />Supported Initial Approvals' treatment of maximum project-specific <br />density. <br /> <br />Supported increasing the percentage of inclusionary, low-income units to a <br />minimum of 10% of the project total. <br /> <br />Supported: <br /> (i) <br /> <br />(ii) <br /> <br />(iii) <br /> <br />adding text to the Specific Plan to amplify neo-traditional <br />elements desired, such as reducing auto-orientation, opening <br />up yards via fence placement/design, achieving street <br />"people-space" via usable porches, etc.; <br />making all non-alley-oriented small-lot prototypes (lots less <br />than 5,000 square feet) discretionary for City acceptance; and <br />adopting a project-average FAR for small-lot prototypes of 55% <br />rather than using FAR maximums. <br /> <br />Summary of Straw Vote Actions Planning Commission <br /> Page 1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.