Laserfiche WebLink
consequently, he would not support the density of the project. Further, the starting point should be <br />mid-point of 35 units. He spoke in favor of extending the green belt to the knoll to reduce density, <br />preventing the removal of 7 trees, providing a wildlife and open space corridor, and reducing visibility <br />of homes on the ridge and knoll. He suggested that the policy be modified for removal of trees and that <br />a $5,000 cost for removal of a tree be instituted and that money be deposited in an "in-lieu-of-tree" fund <br />to be utilized to plant trees in other areas of the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that school issues coincide with growth management and he noted that the <br />General Plan states that "the City will work with school districts to locate school sites to preserve quality <br />of life of existing and new neighbors. Further, that the General Plan encourages limited elementary <br />school enrollment size of up to 650 students to provide more character and promote more personalized <br />education." He noted this is for all schools, not just new schools. Further, the San Francisco property <br />school will be at full capacity the day it opens, even before projects are built that have already been <br />approved. He noted that mitigation measures for projects relating to school overcrowding are <br />inadequate. He commented that Proposition lA has fine print which states you cannot deny a project <br />based on school overcrowding issues and he stated that the community should stop developing until <br />school issues are resolved and that Proposition 1A should be challenged. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that issues relating to contour grading and flat-pad grading be <br />re-examined. He spoke in favor of the creek study being performed and the creek being maintained in <br />the natural state as much as possible, by utilizing trees. He spoke in favor of wildlife corridors to allow <br />children places to go within nature, expanding the size of wildlife corridors, providing public access to <br />corridors, and not including picnic tables or barbecues in open space. He expressed concern with the <br />General Plan and noted that the General Plan specifies the number of homes, that traffic level should not <br />be exceeded, elementary schools should not exceed 650 children, and that land use cannot be reconciled <br />to the infrastructure of the City. He expressed concern with the City not addressing problems that have <br />been identified such as traffic and school overcrowding. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny commended the staff, applicant, and residents for their work on the project. He <br />noted that the Ventana Hills neighbors concerns are not density issues but view shed issues which views <br />they were not guaranteed when they bought their homes. He noted that the developer has reduced the <br />number of lots to have 1.6 density, changed to contour grading for hillside lots, revised lots, relocated <br />property south to create buffer, incorporated minimum building setbacks for homes, and made a number <br />of concessions. He noted that the amenity will serve many more people than just this development and <br />that it will serve a number of people even though it isn't a park. He spoke in favor of a 33 percent FAR <br />ratio for twelve lots to accommodate homes on split pads, growth management as a major project, no <br />Saturday construction, and elimination of the trail. He suggested a revision in the PUD where the <br />homeowner association can provide the trail to the City to provide access and maintenance to the creek. <br />He noted he desired further cooperation between neighbors and residents to resolve issues. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas commended staff and neighbors for their work on the project. She noted the <br />compromises that the developer has made on project. She referenced the Commissioner's handbook and <br />stated that the Commissioners' responsibility is to prepare and administer a master plan for the City and <br />for land adjacent to the City for long-term growth subject to revisions as conditions and land uses <br />change; and administer precise plans in accordance with the General Plan ... She noted that was her <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 7 May 12, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />