Laserfiche WebLink
permit review. He noted his desire for infrastructure being in place and realignment 0f Vineyard Avenue <br />being completed before building of thc school is commenced. He expressed concern with the traffic <br />issues relating to development of the school. He expressed support with splitting Lot 31. He expressed <br />concern with the distribution of the LDR and MDR on the boundaries of Lots 27 and 28 and spoke in <br />favor of reallocating the housing density for RMC Loncstar and providing Lot 27 with additional units. <br />He spoke in favor of deleting the 100-room inn from Lot 28. He expressed concern with eliminating <br />trails from the Plan. Further, he commented on the open space easements and stated he would be <br />deferring to the legal department for a decision and noted that "forever" is a long time. He stated he was <br />not in support of undergrounding of utilities along the existing Vineyard Avenue duc to the expense. He <br />noted that the RMC Lonestar mining operation is an incompatible land use; however, if people persist <br />in purchasing homes after mining operation disclosure has been provided, it is not the responsibility of <br />the City; however, he felt the City should advocate a repeal of the mining act of 1872 at higher <br />governmental levels. <br /> <br />Chairperson Kumaran commended staff and the residents for their work on this project. He commented <br />on the General Plan suggesting that the number of units in the project be 150 and noted that deviations <br />from the General Plan should be clearly substantiated. He commented on the revenue, the costs <br />associated with the infrastructure, keeping congestion down within the City and noted he would be in <br />support of 150 units for the development. Further, he expressed support with Vineyard Avenue being <br />kept at four lanes as specified in the General Plan, and traffic speed being reduced to 35 miles an hour. <br />Further, he suggested that the Police Department provide extra enforcement of reduced speed in this <br />area. He commended staff on their initiative in resolving issues on Lot 3. He spoke in support of the <br />daycare center due to the need for childcare in Pleasanton; however, he stated he was not convinced <br />daycare should have 240 children and noted he would be in favor of 125 children for the daycare <br />facility. He spoke in support of a visual analysis being required for all development. He expressed <br />support for Lot 31 being allocated two home-sites. Chairperson Kumaran expressed his support for <br />organic farming, due to proximity of vineyards to the school and residences. He expressed concern with <br />the Medium Density Residential that is proposed for the project and noted that the Lonestar mining <br />activity could halt the entire project. He expressed concern with having a mining operation in close <br />proximity to school and residences. He noted that people's health and safety is an important issue and <br />that disclosure of mining activity is not adequate mitigation. Commissioner Kumaran urged the City <br />Council to examine issues relating to mining activities, and that mining operations be ceased before <br />development of this project. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Cooper, seconded by Commissioner Maas, to adopt the <br />resolution contained in Attachment 5 recommending approval of the Final EIR documents (Draft <br />EIR, Response to Comments, CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations). <br /> <br />ROLLCALLVOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper and Maas <br />Chairperson Kumaran and Commissioner Sullivan <br />None <br />Commissioners Kameny and Roberts <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 9 April 28, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />