PC 04/28/99 - Laserfiche WebLink

cows activities for the homeowners. He commented that the coral area is adjacent to Lot 31, and noted that the Foley's are attempting to preserve the agricultural space between the lots and impacts on urban development on the cattle operation. He commented on the prior actions of the County and noted that they recognized that the Foleys were trying to preserve agriculture due to their being in operation for 50 years and requested that the Commission concur with the County's decision. David Trotter, 2121 California Boulevard, Walnut Creek, (Lot 28), expressed a desire to locate the vineyard estate in the southwest comer of the lot and requested that the Commission approve staffs recommendation for a 515-foot housing elevation versus 510 feet. Further, he expressed concern with restricting homes adjacent to the Foley property to single story due to occasional cattle activities. Further, he requested that the Commission not reduce the number of new homes to keep the project economically feasible. Paul Fagliano, 1364 Vineyard Avenue, requested that the Commission approve the original Specific Plan which permitted subdivision of Lot 31. He commented on mml areas in the Valley being encroached upon by residential areas. Sheila Fagliano, 1364 Vineyard Avenue, suggested fencing as noise mitigation along the Foley property and requested that the Commission approve the original Specific Plan allowing for subdivision of Lot 31. Martin Inderbitzen, 5510 Sunol Boulevard, commented on the lengthiness of the process and requested that the Commission bring the process to closure. Geoffrey Etnire, a representative of Lonestar noted that Lonestar has worked with the City for a number of years on this Plan, and noted that the Company's position is documented in letters to the City. In response to inquiries by the Commissioners, Mr. Etnire noted that it is a standing decision by Lonestar to continue mining activities and that mining is generally more economically viable than the trade of lots. He commented on Lonestar's cooperation in working with the City of Livermore for their residences on Alden Lane and the mitigation and disclosure measures taken for new development in the area. He noted that Lonestar believes that development is appropriate in the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan area as long as there is an easement relating to quarry operations. He noted that the mining on Lot 21 is worth more than the 27 proposed units; however, he stated he is not aware of the dollar amount of the mining activities. He noted that a decision not to eliminate mining activities is not solely a financial one. He noted that Lonestar is analyzing its mining plan alternatives for Lot 21 including mining north of the proposed right-of-way, and elimination of all mining activity. (Recess taken from 10:35 to 10:40 p.m.) PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED Discussion ensued relating to reallocating units, potential development of open space, clarification of traffic issues on Vineyard Avenue, issues relating to the projects proximity to the Livermore Airport, and issues relating to the infrastructure and trails. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6 April 28, 1999