Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Chairperson Kumaran expressed his regrets to the applicant of Lynnewood United Methodist Church for <br />not being able to hear his application this evening. He commented that the Commission desired to <br />provide ample time for each applicant's hearing and that the Lynnewood United Methodist Church <br />application would be the first item on the April 14, 1999 meeting agenda. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Commissioner Sullivan, to continue <br />Item Nos. 6.b. and 6.c. to the April 14, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />ROLLCALLVOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Maas and Sullivan, Chairperson Kumaran <br />None <br />Commissioner Cooper <br />Commissioners Karneny and Roberts <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan reiterated that he desired a future public hearing to comment on any changes <br />made to the Specific Plan as a result of this heating. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan commended staff for their work on this project; however, he noted additional <br />work still needs to be done. He expressed concern with the possibility of mining on Lot 21 due to <br />mining not being a compatible use for this area. He noted he desired an agreement from RMC Lonestar <br />providing more explanation of mining activities before a Specific Plan is approved. Further, he <br />expressed concern with the "significant and unavoidable impacts of aggregate processing," and the <br />statement of overriding considerations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan further expressed concern with agricultural chemical use and the proposal for an <br />Integrated Pest Management Plan. He stated he has concerns with moving forward without knowing <br />what the impacts will be. He noted he would be providing the Commission with documentation relating <br />to methyl bromide use and non-use in the State of California and expressed concern with the use of <br />methyl bromide and pesticides without having specific guidelines. He suggested that the EIR and <br />Specific Plan contain requirements to have an organic program for pest management that meets the <br />California Organic Food Act of 1990. He noted that sulfur qualifies as an organic use and might be used <br />adjacent to the school. He stated that agricultural users should be certified by a third party such as the <br />California Certified Organic Farmers. Commissioner Sullivan presented a copy of the Organic Food Act <br />of 1990 and other documentation from the California Farmers for the commissioners and staff's review. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan also commented that noise and traffic impacts on Vineyard Avenue need to be <br />further addressed, and he expressed interest in Mr. Posson's suggestion for traffic mitigation, including <br />Vineyard Avenue being reduced from four to two lanes. He further noted that implementation of <br />traffic-calming measures on Chardonnay Drive to reduce cut-through traffic and reduction of Vineyard <br />Avenue to two lanes with bike and pedestrian land would lower the impacts of noise and traffic. He <br />stated his desire for a study to be conducted on traffic issues and impacts before approval of the Specific <br />Plan to determine mitigation factors such as responsibility of funding. He expressed concern for the <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 8 March 23, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />