Laserfiche WebLink
compatibility, he would not be in favor of approving project. He mentioned that it is customary that all <br />finds and penalties are paid in full prior to the hearing and should the public agency find the levy <br />erroneous, the money would be refunded. He was surprised the applicant had not paid the penalties in <br />this case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper stated that due to the business not generating large amounts of income, it is a <br />marginal one. He stated that the land use is compatible and that basing land-use compatibility on future <br />businesses in the area is not appropriate. He stated that the residents in the area knew there were <br />businesses across Stanley Boulevard when they purchased the homes. He noted that the nature of the <br />business does not make it aesthetically pleasing; however, it is a business that the City needs. He stated <br />that the business meets the requirements of the Building Code and requirements of the Fire Department <br />and it is a temporary business with a timeline for completion of a final project. He noted that the <br />applicant did not intend to be non-compliant with City codes, and he noted with appropriate safeguards <br />that findings can be made with a review of application. He noted if the applicant is denied, there is no <br />place else in Pleasanton for this business to operate and he would be in favor of approving the <br />application with conditions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan stated that he could not make the findings and concurred with Commissioner <br />Roberts that this business is a junkyard. He expressed concern with land-use compatibility issues, and <br />the business being located near the Arroyo, the hours of business, and past compliance issues. He stated <br />he desired a way to approve the application and permit the applicant to reach his permanent plan; <br />however, he expressed concern with the two-to-four year timeline for completion of the final project. <br />He suggested relocating materials temporarily until the final plan is approved. He concluded by stating <br />he would like to see the project succeed; however, he could not make the findings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny expressed concern with this business being closed and noted that Stanley is a <br />light industrial area and that the people who bought residences knew it was an industrial area. He noted <br />that the conditions ensure that the business is conducted in a satisfactory manner. He noted he would <br />have a problem making the findings based on its operation today, but he could if based on conditions of <br />approval. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS REOPENED <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan readdressed the Commission and stated his intent is not for the business to be a junkyard. <br />He noted he has removed a significant amount of debris from property. He expressed willingness to live <br />with the conditions requested by staff and to make the property aesthetically pleasing. He noted he has <br />removed six tents and added two containers. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Roberts, seconded by Chairperson Kumaran to deny Case <br />UP-98-37/Z-98-176. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 10 February 10, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />