My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/10/99
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC 02/10/99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:04:54 PM
Creation date
10/24/2001 4:52:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/1999
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/10/99
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF <br /> <br />pL£ASANTON <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MINUTES <br /> <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />City Council Chambers <br />200 Old Bernal Avenue <br />Pleasanton, California <br /> <br />Wednesday, February 10, 1999 <br /> 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />The Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 1999, was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by <br />Chairperson Kumaran. <br /> <br />1_. ROLL CALL <br /> <br />Staff Members Present: <br /> <br />Jerry Iserson, Principal Planner; Roger Higdon, Assistant Director of <br />Public Works; Larissa Seto, Assistant City Attorney; Kerri Watt, <br />Associate Planner, and, Deanne Helgesen, Recording Secretary <br /> <br />Commissioners Present: <br /> <br />Chairperson Kumaran and Commissioners Geoff Cooper, <br />Harvey Kameny, Trish Maas, Mary Roberts and Matt Sullivan <br /> <br />Commissioners Absent: None <br /> <br />2__. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts requested that Page 5, last paragraph, be amended to read: "She would not be in <br />support of approving the project if it were in the middle of downtown because this project is not <br />immediately adjacent to any other..." <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts requested that Page 8, be amended to read, "Commissioner Roberts questioned <br />staff about Finding No. 1 which seemed to imply that the applicant was being denied privileges enjoyed <br />by others and noted that the ...". <br /> <br />Chairperson Kumaran requested that Page 11, second to last paragraph, be amended to read: "However, <br />he expressed concern with the traffic issues in the close proximity of the project to the main road in <br />front and Interstate 680 and suggested relocating buildings to minimize appearance of massing in front <br />and freeway proximity." <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 1 February 10, 1999 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.