PC 080900 - Laserfiche WebLink

He would like to have them come up with a plan and possibly bring it back with a future design review. Commissioner Maas made a motion to make the CEQA Findings as attached to the staff report. Commissioner Sullivan stated that he did not see anything in the findings regarding the impact that tho shortage of electrical power supply has on this action. Mr. Swift noted that this issue was not identified in the EIR as an impact, and that the EIR concludes there is no issue. He stated that it is the Planning Commission's decision as to whether the EIR should be revised or the project should move forward. Chairperson Roberts seconded Commissioner Maas' motion. Chairperson Roberts noted that the situation with PO&E is not really new information and that PG&E has known that it needs to provide power and has prepared a plan with three alternatives to address this need. Mr. Swift also noted that a number of conditions address the mitigation of this potential issue, including Green Building practices. Commissioner Sullivan stated that he is comfortable enough if there are appropriate conditions to address this matter and the matter of the radionuclide test results and the public hearing process. In response to Commissioner Kameny's question regarding the reference on page 22 of the "Findings" to an easement on Parcel 28 for use as a regional trail. Mr. Swift noted that Parcel 28 was tho Arroyo de La Lagnna parcel over which the City was to obtain an easement for a trail. He noted that it should be redrafted to say the City will acquire the entire property. A motion was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Chairperson Roberts, making the CEQA Findings as attached to the staff report. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Axkin, Kameny, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan None None None Resolution No. PC-2000-45 was entered and adopted as motioned. In response to a question from Chairperson Roberts regarding the reference on page 3-13 of the Specific Plan to "a maximum of 600 total residential units for Phase I," Mr. Swift noted that this document was drafted when the number of units were uncertain and that the PUD will control the number. Chairperson Roberts asked about the minimum and maximum number of houses that can be built in a particular style. Mr. Swift clarified that the intent is to provide flexibility, noting that staff didn't want the exact same model on every lot, but didn't want to restrict that a certain number of PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 9, 2000 Page 16