My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061400
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
PC 061400
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:46 PM
Creation date
8/1/2001 5:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/14/2000
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 061400
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
staff recommends that the Commission approve the application by making the Tentative <br />Subdivision Map findings as listed in the staff report; approve the Tentative Subdivision Map <br />applications and related subdivision design features, subject to the conditions listed in <br />Exhibit "B;" and approve the architectural designs for the eight production models as shown in <br />Exhibit "A." <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to the Jardin parcel; issues relating to Condition No. 59, Clara Lane at <br />Jardin Border; McGuire EVA width; lowerin~ pads of houses to maintain views; utilizing <br />contour grading; whether there is a condition addressing l~ees; utilization of retaining wails on <br />the project; traffic consols that will be utilized on Vineyard Avenue; whether the PUD requires a <br />disclosure relating to the Livermore Airport and RMC Lonestar; expansion of the mining <br />operations; fencing conditions; berm locations; and the timeline for the project. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Phil Rowe, developer, noted that the widening of Clara Road will be adjacent to where the Jardin <br />property star'cs and that there will be a 20-foot easement to ailow for widening. He stated that the <br />applicant has resolved issues relating to the road and desires to move forward on the project. <br />Mr. Rowe commented on the lawsuit initiated by Mr. Oelman. Mr. Rowe stated that a disclosure <br />will be provided to prospective buyers on issues relating to the Airport and RMC Lonestar. <br />Mr. Rowe noted that the landscaping plan was added for the Commissioners' review. He <br />expressed concern with the timing of the project and noted that the City Council has approved <br />this property for growth management for the year 2000. Mr. Rowe provided an overview of the <br />McGuire lots and height issues of the hill. He stated that the developer has a good working <br />relationship with staff and will be able to address issues raised by the Commission. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas, Mr. Rowe noted that Delco only has plans to <br />develop property already acquired. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas commended the developer on the individuality of home models and the <br />number of single-story homes. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to the house at Lot M2 and reducing the home to a single story. <br /> <br />Doyle Heaton, Delco Builders, commented on the amount of money invested in the project and <br />noted that this project will provide the beginnit~g ~cture for the new school and the <br />Vineyard Corridor. Mr. Heaton stated that each lot represents $30,000 in cash or off-site <br />improvements. He noted that the developer has attempted to meet the requirements of the PUD. <br />He noted his desire for a supportive vote t~om the Commission to continue the grading plan and <br />stated that if approved, the project will commence in the Fail of 2000. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued relating to colors for the homes in the project, grading issues, and pads <br />utilized for the project. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 14, 2000 Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.